歡迎來到不一致再次發生一系列卷八, 全國聯保新聞. 我碰到 本文 recently regarding an endemic Puerto Rican butterfly. 誰可以告訴我到底為什麼這份報告是一種誤導? 它可以比標準的GOP棘手一點 (我建議放棄任何先前相關縮略詞以這些字母). Hint, just telling me the butterfly in the picture is from Malaysia is not the answer I’m looking for!
5 comments to Genius of the Press VIII |
懷疑論 |
The article’s title contradicts with the content. The habitat will receive the protected status, not the species.
Is this the solution?
The review also could determine that protected status is not warranted – the report makes it seem as if protection is imminent.
You’re both right, but not quite the answer I’m looking for! This GOP is in line with the others I’ve done and is taxonomy related, just not as glaring (I actually didn’t realize it for a while).
“Harlequin butterfly family”? There is no such thing. The PR species (Atlantea tulita) is one of the brush-footed butterflies (family Nymphalidae), while the Malayan species shown (Paralaxita orphua) is a metalmark (family Riodinidae).
賓果. I took for granted that I’ve seen similar Riodinidae in Costa Rica – figured it wasn’t a stretch that one was threatened on PR. I actually posted this link on a message board without looking any of it up to fact check – dawned on me days later to go back and find out more about the lep. Almost snuck by me…