언론의 천재의이 문제에 대한, 뭐가 잘못 됐는지 말해 줄 수있는 사람 이 문서? 그것은 꽤 미묘한, 하지만 분명한 실수, 특히 라이브 사이언스에 대한.
언론 15 세의 천재언론의 천재의이 문제에 대한, 뭐가 잘못 됐는지 말해 줄 수있는 사람 이 문서? 그것은 꽤 미묘한, 하지만 분명한 실수, 특히 라이브 사이언스에 대한. 6 comments to Genius of the Press XV |
회의 |
Hymenoptera and diptera are orders, not species.
That’s not actually what I was looking for, but I would agree that it’s some really bad writing. Clearly that should read “species of hymenoptera and diptera”. So I guess you’re right on that account!
하지만, there is one other error that is even a bit worse…
Pictured critter is an hymenopteran. Doesn’t seem too subtle a mistake to me.
Exactly – more basic insect mistakes that I would expect from a lower quality publication. A wasp is not a fly!
But other than the glaring mistakes, the story behind this is very cool. I will have to now go back and take a look at the Braconids I studied as an undergraduate! I wonder how well these color patterns hold up between species or genera…
Whoops, bad Live Science.
Thanks for this, I missed the article that this is referencing, very cool and beautiful stuff.
[…] Thanks for Chris at Skeptical Moth for bringing this paper, which cruised below my radar, to light. […]