La más pequeña de las polillas

ResearchBlogging.org

El Nepticulidae familia poseen algunas de las más pequeñas polillas conocidas, que van desde 3-8mm punta de ala a ala-tip. For a comparison I have imaged two moths above: el más grande conocido – Coscinocera hercules that tips the scales at nearly 9 pulgadas, and one of the smallest (yes that tiny little speck below the Hercules moth) – Ectoedemia rubifoliella, also imaged below. The Nepticulidae are surprisingly diverse, con más de 800 species described that likely represent only 10% of the actual diversity (Powell, 2009). In the United States we have only 80 especies, of which 25 are known from the west. When you compare that diversity to the 100 or so species known from Great Britain, it’s clear that the US knowledge is vastly lacking. En realidad, over 80% of all nepticulid diversity is known from Europe alone. A strange inversion when you consider that the neotropics are the world’s most diverse ecosystems yet have only 74 known Nepticulidae species! (Puplesis, 2000). Why is this so?

Ectoedemia rubifoliella 3.3mm

Stigmella ostryaefoliella 3.1mm

The European diversity can easily be explained away due to a high concentration of bored Lepidopterists. The Holarctic fauna is not the most diverse and it therefore has become the best understood on the planet, not to mention they have had a long history of gentleman entomologists dating back hundreds of years. But the rest of the Nepticulidae diversity remains a mystery because they are really, realmente pequeña, hard to spread, and difficult to identify as adults! I have actually had little practice or success with mounting Nepticulidae, and the above specimens should be credited to Dr. David Wagner. The very few that I do have in my collection are simply pinned and un-spread; and even the pinning proves hard enough when a slip of the hand can obliterate the entire specimen. Apparently the best method for mounting is to knock them down in the freezer and pin them while they are still alive. Not the most humane, but the only way to keep the moth from drying before your eyes and becoming impossible to manipulate. As hard as the adults are to manage, the larvae are rather characteristic in that most are leaf minersthey feed on the material entre the leaf epidermises. This lends to the common name ofleaf blotch minersbecause you can see the translucent patches the moths have ‘minedout from inside the leaf. Not only is each species rather host-specific, but they tend to form very characteristic mine patterns within the leaf. So if you find a leaf mine and you know the species of plant, chances are you can find out the species of Nepticulid within it (however not all leaf mines are nepticulids, there are lots of other insects that do this as well). Rearing these moths are also rather simple, all you have to do is pop the leaf in a bag and wait for the moth to finish feeding. One caterpillar only needs one leaf (or tiny section of leaf) – but care has to be taken to keep the leaf green while the caterpillar feeds. If the leaf dies, so will the caterpillar. Because of this paradoxical ability to identify the mines and not the adults there is a surprising amount of ecological research done on them, especially since a few pose threats to commercial crops. The first image below clearly illustrates the caterpillar feeding within the leafand the trail of frass it has left behind.

Stigmella aceris (link to image credit)

Stigmella paradoxa (link to image credit)

If you look at the above images of mines it’s not all that difficult to imagine structures like this fossilizing. And amazingly, they have! The first image below (Labandeira et al., 1994) shows a variety of leaf mining Nepticulidae mines (and a Gracillariidae) from the mid-Cretaceous (97 Hace millones de años). The spectacular thing about leaf mines is that you can get down to genus level and sometimes even species. The authors were able to differentiate between the nepticulid genera Stigmella y Ectoedemia based on the patterns preserved in the fossils; patterns we still use to help separate genera today. The bottom illustration is from a mine discovered in Japan that is only around 8 million years old (Kuroko, 1987).

(Labanderia, 1994)

(Kuroko, 1987)

referencias

Kuroko, H. (1987). A Fossil Leaf Mine of Nepticulidae (Lepidópteros) from Japan. Bulletin Sugadaira Montane Res. Cen., No.8, 119-121.

Labandeira, do. (1994). Ninety-Seven Million Years of Angiosperm-Insect Association: Paleobiological Insights into the Meaning of Coevolution Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91 (25), 12278-12282 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12278

PUPLESIS, R., DIŠKUS, A., ROBINSON, G., & ONORE, sol. (2002). A review and checklist of the Neotropical Nepticulidae (Lepidópteros) Bulletin of The Natural History Museum. Entomology Series, 71 (01) DOI: 10.1017/S0968045402000032

Powell, J.A., Opler, P.A. (2010). Polillas del oeste de América del Norte – by J. La. Powell and P. La. Opler Systematic Entomology, 35 (2), 347-347 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00525.x

Una extraña lobopodia blindado desde el Cámbrico

ResearchBlogging.org Los primeros mares cámbricos (542-488 Hace millones de años) tenía una gran cantidad de criaturas extrañas y bizarras casi inimaginable para igualar la mejor ciencia ficción soñador. Como posiblemente uno de los precursores de los Artrópodos (además Onychophora y Tardigrada), los linajes lobopodia representan un extraño grupo de “gusanos con patas” que una vez habitaron los antiguos fondos marinos. Exactamente lo cerca que están a los verdaderos artrópodos es tema de debate (árbol abajo), pero este género y especie recién descubierta, Eventos cactiformis (cactus caminar), representa el más esclerotizado y artrópodos como de cualquier conocido hasta la fecha.

Este monstruo friolera de dos pulgadas y media nos ayuda a comprender la transición de un gusano de cuerpo blando como la criatura en un artrópodo de cáscara dura; sino que también da una mejor impresión de lo diverso que pueden haber sido estos apéndices lobopodia. Es una pregunta fascinante, porque la ventaja de articulado, esclerotizado, extremidades fue que explotó y diversificada entre las criaturas que conocemos hoy. Exactamente cómo sucedió esto no es más cerca de ser resuelto, pero parece como si las patas de este animal fueron esclerotizados antes de que el cuerpo (arthropodization vs. arthrodization). Un pequeño fósil descubierto y otra pequeña visión de la historia evolutiva.

 

referencias

Liu, J., Steiner, METRO., Dunlop, J., Keupp, H., Shu, RE., o, Q., Han, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2011). Un lobopodia Cámbrico blindado de China con apéndices de artrópodos similares Naturaleza, 470 (7335), 526-530 DOI: 10.1038/nature09704

Otras lecturas: A los colegas blog en el lobopodia en húngaro.

Un año en perspectiva

Oops, looks like I missed my first ‘blogoversary’! Monday the 21st was the one year turning point for my blog; and I’m incredibly happy to have spent the last year sharing some of my ramblings with all of you. I’ve somewhat lost track of how many hits I’ve had since I moved everything over to The Southern Fried Science Network, but it’s more than I ever could have ever imagined as a newbie blogger twelve months ago. When I look over the last year a few posts come to mind as my favorite:

Adela trigrapha (Moth Tasting in Napa)

Continue reading A Year in Review

Los Reyes estás contento?

Shockingly, stunningly, amazingly; los las monarchs are back (but not co-staring Julianne Moore). Aceptar, it’s not that amazing; I pretty much predicted this would be the case last March when everyone was running around terrified because the butterflies hit an all time low (since counting started en 1993). Actually I believe I saidI will bet anything on the population making a recovery in the years to come…”. Tan, how about anything = beer, and who’s buying?

Perhaps I am celebrating a bit early. Maybe the news isn’t so good that I can run a victory lap quite yet, but preliminary surveys look like the overwintering populations have doubled this year. That’s a pretty good start, but we still haven’t hit the 18 year average (not an impressive statistic). But don’t misread my intentionsI’m not claiming this one year somehow has proven the decline insignificant. It may or may not be, all we can really say is that it’s just another data point. The fact is that our dataset is very weak and there are factors such as local weather that create massive margins of error. It’s also nearly impossible to extrapolate from what little data we do have. So is the monarch a very goodcanary in the coal mine”?

I would say poor at best. How is one insect species that roosts in massive singular colonies a good indicator of our ecosystem? Sí, they migrate from all reaches of North America, but their recent high mortality rates have nothing to do with the lives they lived outside of Mexico. Perhaps if millions of butterflies died of some strange toxin we could heed the warning, but such was not the case. Those poor monarchs are at the mercy of winter storms that are likely to become more frequent with a warming climate. So can we say that climate change is negatively impacting these animals? Turns out we can’t, at least not yet. If this were to be so then our data is telling us that the 1996-1997 season was a really healthy one where clouds of pollution parted and nature rejoiced. Did the 2010 season then become a post apocalyptic blade-runner-esque world where acid rain melted the orange off of butterfly wings? Clearly not. Neither climate nor pollution were drastically different in those years. The monarchs just had a really good year followed by some really bad ones. Maybe we should just find a better canary if we’re trying to blow the whistle on global warming or deforestation.

As a last thought here is a video from the above story. Just as you’d expect, it’s over dramatized and a bit hilarious.

 

Genio de la Prensa XVI

Un softbol para este desafío Partido Republicano. Esta imagen viene de cuidado del Abogado Victoria (Papel TX) – con un mal artículo escrito acerca de las mariposas. Este fracaso de imagen es bastante fácil, pero para ganar puntos extra que me puede decir ¿qué otra cosa es incorrecta en el texto?

 

Nueva Cabecera

I’ve uploaded a new header as you can seehow does it look? I’m playing around with the settings, but please let me know if the moth on the right gets cropped awkwardly, and what your screen resolution is if that is the case.

Gracias!

Butterflies for Beer

(Credit: David Cappaert, Insectimages.org)

 

If you happen to be living out in Yolo, Solano or Sacramento counties you should head out with a net. Dr.. Art Shaprio has offered for the 40th year his cabbage white butterfly competition. If you are the very first person to catch a cabbage white (pieris rapae invasive) before Dr. Shapiro he will buy you a pitcher of beer! You have to deliver the specimen alive to the receptionist in the Department of Evolution and Ecology to confirm the identification (I assume to prove you didn’t just save last year’s dead butterfly and cheat).

Over the last 30 years the butterflies have been emerging earliertwo weeks on average now. You better hurry, the first cabbage white of 2010 was collected on January 27th.

Check your horoscope today?

I did, and it sounds like it was written by Sarah Palin. En realidad, I came across this meta analysis of over 22,000 horoscopes over on Information is Beautiful. It’s spectacularbut I’ll run down a few points here:

From these 22,000 horoscopes came a chart of the most common words (bottom), 90% of which happen to be exactly the same regardless of your sign. David McCandless also generated a meta prediction using these most common words. It goes something like this.

Ready? Seguro? Whatever the situation or secret moment enjoy everything a lot. Feel able to absolutely care. Expect nothing else. Keep making love. Family and friends matter. The world is life, fun and energy. Maybe hard. Or easy. Taking exactly enough is best. Help and talk to others. Change your mind and a better mood comes along

Everyone, con suerte, should know that horoscopes and astrology have always been steaming piles. Seeing the data like this just makes it that much easier to laugh in the face of wackiness. I also love McCandless’s interpretation of star traits. I’m agemini” (or at least was), and the most common words for me areparty, stay, issues and listen certainly”. Interpreted asemotionally disturbed party animal who never says no”. Love it.

You might have also heard recently about the scandalous story of wrong star assignments. As it turns out our earth wobbles slightly in orbit; meaning the stars are not exactly where they are in the night sky tonight as they were a few millennia ago when the zodiac was first derived. So if the stars mold who you are at birth then they do so based on where they are now and not 2,000 years ago. Surprisemany people should now be assigned to a new sign! Ooooh scandal! The science of astrology didn’t even come close to predicting this (it greatly pained me to even mockingly call astrology science). But that’s OK it won’t perturb them, they are well adapt at dodging hard science and spinning BS, and have been doing so for hundreds of years. De nuevo en 1781 astronomers threw a wrench at the heads of astrologers with the discovery of Uranusand a generation later Neptune appeared on the scene. Oh don’t worry! Astrologers fudged their own numbers, whined about differentcharts and systemsand snuck in two extra star signs to agree with the world as science understood it. ¡Ay, and never mind the rest of the billion, billion stars and planets

Yet, I can still hear a faint cry down the street here in Berkeleysomeone slaps hand to head and exclaimsoh now it makes sense, I was a Taurus todo along!”

You should go explore his blog and take a closer look at the analysis. Better yet, if you have a friend who loves their astrology, you should forward this in their direction.

 

 

 

La entomofagia: polillas para la cena

Este post fue elegido como la selección de un editor para ResearchBlogging.org Siempre he sabido que en muchos lugares del mundo, especialmente fuera de los caminos, orugas de las polillas y mariposas están en el menú. From Africa a Australia there are dozens of species that might taste good enough to be reasonably edible or even delicious. But here in the US insects rarely if ever make it onto our tables (at least not to our knowledge) – but occasionally into our bottles. I’m sure that many of you have seen the worm at the bottom of the tequila bottle: which is actually the caterpillar of the Cossid moth Hypotpa agavis. I have even heard reports that migrant Mexican workers dig up native plants on their lunch break to snack on the large pink larvae of a related moth; probably in the genus Comadia. Despite my previous knowledge, I was a bit surprised by a recent article discussing the massive diversity of Lepidoptera used as staple food sources throughout Mexico.

(de Wikipedia)

Continue reading Entomophagy: polillas para la cena

Genio de la Prensa XV

Para esta edición de la genialidad de la prensa, quien me puede decir lo que está mal con Este artículo? Es bastante sutil, pero un error claro, especialmente para LiveScience.