Obitelj Nepticulidae držite neke od najmanjih moljaca poznatih, u rasponu od 3-8mm krila vrha do vrha krila. Za usporedbu sam snimio dva moljce gore: najveći poznati – Coscinocera herculesthat tips the scales at nearly 9 inča, a jedan od najmanjih (yes that tiny little speck below the Hercules moth) – Ectoedemia rubifoliella, also imaged below. The Nepticulidae are surprisingly diverse, with over 800 species described that likely represent only 10% of the actual diversity (Powell, 2009). In the United States we have only 80 vrsta, of which 25 are known from the west. When you compare that diversity to the 100 or so species known from Great Britain, it’s clear that the US knowledge is vastly lacking. Zapravo, over 80% of all nepticulid diversity is known from Europe alone. A strange inversion when you consider that the neotropics are the world’s most diverse ecosystems yet have only 74 known Nepticulidae species! (Puplesis, 2000). Why is this so?
Ectoedemia rubifoliella3.3mm
Stigmella ostryaefoliella3.1mm
The European diversity can easily be explained away due to a high concentration of bored Lepidopterists. The Holarctic fauna is not the most diverse and it therefore has become the best understood on the planet, not to mention they have had a long history of gentleman entomologists dating back hundreds of years. But the rest of the Nepticulidae diversity remains a mystery because they are really, Stvarno mali, hard to spread, and difficult to identify as adults! I have actually had little practice or success with mounting Nepticulidae, and the above specimens should be credited to Dr. Dave Wagner. The very few that I do have in my collection are simply pinned and un-spread; and even the pinning proves hard enough when a slip of the hand can obliterate the entire specimen. Apparently the best method for mounting is to knock them down in the freezer and pin them while they are still alive. Not the most humane, but the only way to keep the moth from drying before your eyes and becoming impossible to manipulate. As hard as the adults are to manage, the larvae are rather characteristic in that most are leaf miners – they feed on the materializmeđuthe leaf epidermises. This lends to the common name of “leaf blotch miners” because you can see the translucent patches the moths have ‘mined’ out from inside the leaf. Not only is each species rather host-specific, but they tend to form very characteristic mine patterns within the leaf. So if you find a leaf mine and you know the species of plant, chances are you can find out the species of Nepticulid within it (however not all leaf mines are nepticulids, there are lots of other insects that do this as well). Rearing these moths are also rather simple, all you have to do is pop the leaf in a bag and wait for the moth to finish feeding. One caterpillar only needs one leaf (or tiny section of leaf) – but care has to be taken to keep the leaf green while the caterpillar feeds. If the leaf dies, so will the caterpillar. Because of this paradoxical ability to identify the mines and not the adults there is a surprising amount of ecological research done on them, especially since a few pose threats to commercial crops. The first image below clearly illustrates the caterpillar feeding within the leaf – and the trail of frass it has left behind.
If you look at the above images of mines it’s not all that difficult to imagine structures like this fossilizing. And amazingly, they have! The first image below (Labandeira et al., 1994) shows a variety of leaf mining Nepticulidae mines (and a Gracillariidae) from the mid-Cretaceous (97 million years ago). The spectacular thing about leaf mines is that you can get down to genus level and sometimes even species. The authors were able to differentiate between the nepticulid generaStigmellai Ectoedemiabased on the patterns preserved in the fossils; patterns we still use to help separate genera today. The bottom illustration is from a mine discovered in Japan that is only around 8 million years old (Kuroko, 1987).
(Labanderia, 1994)
(Kuroko, 1987)
Reference
Kuroko, H. (1987). A Fossil Leaf Mine of Nepticulidae (Leptiri) from Japan. Bulletin Sugadaira Montane Res. Cen., No.8, 119-121.
Labandeira, C. (1994). Ninety-Seven Million Years of Angiosperm-Insect Association: Paleobiological Insights into the Meaning of CoevolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91 (25), 12278-12282 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12278
PUPLESIS, R., DIŠKUS, A., ROBINSON, G., & ONORE, G. (2002). A review and checklist of the Neotropical Nepticulidae (Leptiri) Bulletin of The Natural History Museum. Entomology Series, 71 (01) DOI: 10.1017/S0968045402000032
Powell, J.A., Opler, P.A. (2010). Moljci zapadne Sjeverne Amerike – by J. A. Powell and P. A. OplerSystematic Entomology, 35 (2), 347-347 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00525.x
The early Cambrian seas (542-488 million years ago) had a plethora ofstrange and bizarre creaturesalmost unimaginable to even the best sci-fi dreamer. As possibly one of the precursors to the Arthropoda (također Onychophora i Tardigrada), the lobopodian lineages represent a strange group of “worms with legs” that once roamed the ancient sea beds. Exactly how close they are to the true arthropods is up for debate (tree below), but this newly discovered genus and species, Diania cactiformis(walking cactus), represents the most well sclerotized and arthropod-like of any known to date.
This whopping two and a half inch monster helps us understand the transition from a soft bodied worm like creature into a hard-shelled arthropod; it also gives a better impression of how diverse these lobopodian appendages may have been. It’s a fascinating question because the advantage of jointed, sclerotized, limbs was one that exploded and diversified amongst the creatures we know today. Exactly how this happened is not any closer to being resolved, but it appears as if the legs of this animal were sclerotized before the body (arthropodization vs. arthrodization). One small fossil discovered and yet another small insight into evolutionary history.
Reference
Liu, J., Steiner, M., Dunlop, J., Keupp, H., Shu, D., Ou, Q., Han, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2011). An armoured Cambrian lobopodian from China with arthropod-like appendagesNature, 470 (7335), 526-530 DOI: 10.1038/nature09704
ups, looks like I missed my first ‘blogoversary’! Monday the 21st was the one year turning point for my blog; and I’m incredibly happy to have spent the last year sharing some of my ramblings with all of you. I’ve somewhat lost track of how many hits I’ve had since I moved everything over to The Southern Fried Science Network, but it’s more than I ever could have ever imagined as a newbie blogger twelve months ago. When I look over the last year a few posts come to mind as my favorite:
Shockingly, stunningly, amazingly; themonarchs are back (but not co-staring Julianne Moore). u redu, it’s not that amazing; I pretty much predictedthis would be the case last March when everyone was running around terrified because the butterflies hit an all time low (since counting startedu 1993). Actually I believe I said “I will bet anything on the population making a recovery in the years to come…”. Tako, how about anything = beer, and who’s buying?
Perhaps I am celebrating a bit early. Maybe the news isn’t so good that I can run a victory lap quite yet, but preliminary surveys look like the overwintering populations have doubled this year. That’s a pretty good start, but we still haven’t hit the 18 year average (not an impressive statistic). But don’t misread my intentions – I’m not claiming this one year somehow has proven the decline insignificant. It may or may not be, all we can really say is that it’s just another data point. The fact is that our dataset is very weak and there are factors such as local weather that create massive margins of error. It’s also nearly impossible to extrapolate from what little data we do have. So is the monarch a very good “canary in the coal mine”?
I would say poor at best. How is one insect species that roosts in massive singular colonies a good indicator of our ecosystem? Da, they migrate from all reaches of North America, but their recent high mortality rates have nothing to do with the lives they lived outside of Mexico. Perhaps if millions of butterflies died of some strange toxin we could heed the warning, but such was not the case. Those poor monarchs are at the mercy of winter storms that are likely to become more frequent with a warming climate. So can we say that climate change is negatively impacting these animals? Turns out we can’t, at least not yet. If this were to be so then our data is telling us that the1996-1997 seasonwas a really healthy one where clouds of pollution parted and nature rejoiced. Did the 2010 season then become a post apocalyptic blade-runner-esque world where acid rain melted the orange off of butterfly wings? Clearly not. Neither climate nor pollution were drastically different in those years. The monarchs just had a really good year followed by some really bad ones. Maybe we should just find a better canary if we’re trying to blow the whistle on global warming or deforestation.
As a last thought here is a video from the above story. Just as you’d expect, it’s over dramatized and a bit hilarious.
Softball za ovaj GOP izazov. Za ovu sliku brine Victoria Advocate (TX papir) – s loše napisan članak o leptirima. Ovaj promašaj slike je prilično jednostavan, ali za dodatne bodove tko mi može reći što je još netočno u tekstu?
Ja sam učitao novu zaglavlje kao što možete vidjeti – Kako to izgleda? Igram se s postavkama, ali molim vas javite mi ako moljac na desnoj dobiva ošišan nespretno, i što na razlučivost zaslona je ako je to slučaj.
Ako vam se dogoditi da se živi u YOLO, Solano ili Sacramento županije trebali krenuti s mrežom. Dr.. Art Shaprio has offered for the 40th year hiscabbage white butterfly competition. Ako ste prva osoba uhvatiti kupus bijeli (Pieris out – invasive) before Dr. Shapiro he will buy you a pitcher of beer! You have to deliver the specimenaliveto the receptionist in the Department of Evolution and Ecology to confirm the identification (I assume to prove you didn’t just save last year’s dead butterfly and cheat).
Over the last 30 years the butterflies have been emerging earlier – two weeks on average now. You better hurry, the first cabbage white of 2010 was collected on January 27th.
Jesam, i to zvuči kao da je napisao Sarah Palin. Zapravo, Sam došao preko ovaj meta analizu više 22,000 horoskop više o Informacija je Lijepa. To je spektakularno – ali ja ću trknuti nekoliko točaka ovdje:
Od njih 22,000 horoskop je došao grafikon najčešćih riječi (dno), 90% od kojih se dogoditi da se isti, bez obzira na vaš znak. David McCandless je također ostvarila meta predviđanja pomoću ove najčešće riječi. To ide otprilike ovako.
“Spreman? Svakako? Bez obzira na situaciju ili tajno trenutak uživati u svemu puno. Osjetite stanju apsolutno briga. Očekujte ništa drugo. Držite vođenje ljubavi. Obitelj i prijatelji tvari. Svijet je život, zabavno i energije. Možda je teško. Ili jednostavno. Uzimanje dovoljno točno je najbolje. Pomoć i razgovarati s drugima. Promijenite svoj um i bolje raspoloženje dolazi zajedno…“
Svako, nadam, treba znati da horoskop i astrologija su uvijek bili pari piloti. Vidjevši podatke kao što su to samo čini da je mnogo lakše smijati u lice wackiness. Također volim McCandless je tumačenje zvijezda osobina. Ja sam “Blizanci” (ili je barem), a najčešće su riječi za mene su “stranka, ostati, Pitanja i slušati sigurno”. Tumači kao “emocionalno uznemireni stranke životinja koji nikad ne govori”. Ljubav je.
Možda je također čuo u zadnje vrijeme o tome Skandalozna priča pogrešnih zvijezda zadataka. Kako se ispostavlja naša zemlja malo kolebanja u orbiti; što znači da zvijezde nisu točno gdje su na noćnom nebu večeras kao što su bili nekoliko tisućljeća prije, kada je prvi put izvedena zodijak. Dakle, ako još kalup koji ste po rođenju onda oni to rade prema kojoj su sada, a ne 2,000 Prije nekoliko godina. Iznenađenje – mnogi ljudi bi sada trebao biti dodijeljen novi znak! Ooooh skandal! Znanost o astrologiji nije ni došao blizu predviđanje ovo (to me jako boljelo čak podrugljivo nazvati astrologija znanost). Ali to je u redu da ih neće narušiti, oni su dobro prilagode na dodging tvrdi znanost i vrti BS, te su na taj način već stotinama godina. Povratak u 1781 astronomi bacio ključ u glavama astrologa s otkrićem Urana – i generacije poslije Neptun pojavio na sceni. Ma ne brinite! Astrolozi fudged svoje brojeve, zacvilio o različitim “ljestvice i sustavi” i ušuljao se u dva pomoćna znakove zvijezda složiti sa svijetom kao znanost ga razumio. Oh, a kamoli ostatak milijardi, milijardu zvijezde i planete…
Još, Ja još uvijek mogu čuti tihi krik niz ulicu ovdje u Berkeleyu – netko udari ruku na glavu i uzvikuje “oh sad ima smisla, Bio sam Bik svi duž!”
Trebali bi ići istražiti njegov blog i uzeti bliži pogled na analizi. Još bolje, ako imate prijatelja koji voli svoju astrologiju, trebali proslijediti to u njihovom smjeru.
Uvijek sam znao da je u mnogim mjestima u svijetu, pogotovo izvan utabana staza, gusjenice za moljaca i leptira su na jelovniku. Iz Afrika za Australija postoje deseci vrsta koja okusio dovoljno dobro da bi bilo razumno jestivo ili čak ukusna. No, ovdje u SAD insekata rijetko, ako ikada to učiniti na našim stolovima (barem ne na našim znanjem) – ali povremeno u naše boce. Siguran sam da su mnogi od vas vidjeli crva na dnu boce tekilom: što je zapravo gusjenica za Cossid moljac Hypotpa agavis. Čak sam čuo izvješća da migranti meksički radnici iskopati biljke na pauze za ručak za užinu na velikom ružičastom ličinki srodnom moljca; vjerojatno u rodu Komedija. Unatoč mom prethodnom znanju, Bio sam malo iznenađen nedavnom članku raspravlja o golemu raznolikost Lepidoptera koriste kao izvori sortirano hrane širom Meksika.
For this issue of the genius of the press, who can tell me what’s wrong withthis article? It’s pretty subtle, but a clear mistake, especially for LiveScience.