Il più piccolo di falene

ResearchBlogging.org

La famiglia Nepticulidae tenere alcune delle falene più piccole conosciute, che vanno da 3-8mm wing-tip a wing-tip. Per un confronto che ho ripreso due falene sopra: il più grande conosciuto – Coscinocera hercules that tips the scales at nearly 9 pollici, e uno dei più piccoli (yes that tiny little speck below the Hercules moth) – Ectoedemia rubifoliella, also imaged below. The Nepticulidae are surprisingly diverse, con oltre 800 species described that likely represent only 10% of the actual diversity (Powell, 2009). In the United States we have only 80 specie, di cui 25 are known from the west. When you compare that diversity to the 100 or so species known from Great Britain, it’s clear that the US knowledge is vastly lacking. Effettivamente, over 80% of all nepticulid diversity is known from Europe alone. A strange inversion when you consider that the neotropics are the world’s most diverse ecosystems yet have only 74 known Nepticulidae species! (Puplesis, 2000). Why is this so?

Ectoedemia rubifoliella 3.3mm

Stigmella ostryaefoliella 3.1mm

The European diversity can easily be explained away due to a high concentration of bored Lepidopterists. The Holarctic fauna is not the most diverse and it therefore has become the best understood on the planet, not to mention they have had a long history of gentleman entomologists dating back hundreds of years. But the rest of the Nepticulidae diversity remains a mystery because they are really, veramente piccolo, hard to spread, and difficult to identify as adults! I have actually had little practice or success with mounting Nepticulidae, and the above specimens should be credited to Dr. Dave Wagner. The very few that I do have in my collection are simply pinned and un-spread; and even the pinning proves hard enough when a slip of the hand can obliterate the entire specimen. Apparently the best method for mounting is to knock them down in the freezer and pin them while they are still alive. Not the most humane, but the only way to keep the moth from drying before your eyes and becoming impossible to manipulate. As hard as the adults are to manage, the larvae are rather characteristic in that most are leaf minersthey feed on the material tra the leaf epidermises. This lends to the common name ofleaf blotch minersbecause you can see the translucent patches the moths have ‘minedout from inside the leaf. Not only is each species rather host-specific, but they tend to form very characteristic mine patterns within the leaf. So if you find a leaf mine and you know the species of plant, chances are you can find out the species of Nepticulid within it (however not all leaf mines are nepticulids, there are lots of other insects that do this as well). Rearing these moths are also rather simple, all you have to do is pop the leaf in a bag and wait for the moth to finish feeding. One caterpillar only needs one leaf (or tiny section of leaf) – but care has to be taken to keep the leaf green while the caterpillar feeds. If the leaf dies, so will the caterpillar. Because of this paradoxical ability to identify the mines and not the adults there is a surprising amount of ecological research done on them, especially since a few pose threats to commercial crops. The first image below clearly illustrates the caterpillar feeding within the leafand the trail of frass it has left behind.

Stigmella aceris (link to image credit)

Stigmella paradoxa (link to image credit)

If you look at the above images of mines it’s not all that difficult to imagine structures like this fossilizing. And amazingly, they have! The first image below (Labandeira et al., 1994) shows a variety of leaf mining Nepticulidae mines (and a Gracillariidae) from the mid-Cretaceous (97 milioni di anni fa). The spectacular thing about leaf mines is that you can get down to genus level and sometimes even species. The authors were able to differentiate between the nepticulid genera Stig Mella e Ectoedemia based on the patterns preserved in the fossils; patterns we still use to help separate genera today. The bottom illustration is from a mine discovered in Japan that is only around 8 million years old (Kuroko, 1987).

(Labanderia, 1994)

(Kuroko, 1987)

References

Kuroko, H. (1987). A Fossil Leaf Mine of Nepticulidae (Lepidotteri) from Japan. Bulletin Sugadaira Montane Res. Cen., No.8, 119-121.

Labandeira, C. (1994). Ninety-Seven Million Years of Angiosperm-Insect Association: Paleobiological Insights into the Meaning of Coevolution Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91 (25), 12278-12282 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12278

PUPLESIS, R., DIŠKUS, A., ROBINSON, G., & ONORE, sol. (2002). A review and checklist of the Neotropical Nepticulidae (Lepidotteri) Bulletin of The Natural History Museum. Entomology Series, 71 (01) DOI: 10.1017/S0968045402000032

Powell, J.A., Opler, P.A. (2010). Moths of Western North Americaby J. La. Powell and P. La. Opler Systematic Entomology, 35 (2), 347-347 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00525.x

Una strana lobopodian corazzato dal Cambriano

ResearchBlogging.org I primi mari Cambriano (542-488 milioni di anni fa) had a plethora of strange and bizarre creatures almost unimaginable to even the best sci-fi dreamer. Come forse uno dei precursori della artropodi (also Onychophora e Tardigrada), i lignaggi lobopodian rappresentano uno strano gruppo di “vermi con le gambe” that once roamed the ancient sea beds. Exactly how close they are to the true arthropods is up for debate (tree below), but this newly discovered genus and species, Diania cactiformis (walking cactus), represents the most well sclerotized and arthropod-like of any known to date.

This whopping two and a half inch monster helps us understand the transition from a soft bodied worm like creature into a hard-shelled arthropod; it also gives a better impression of how diverse these lobopodian appendages may have been. It’s a fascinating question because the advantage of jointed, sclerotized, limbs was one that exploded and diversified amongst the creatures we know today. Exactly how this happened is not any closer to being resolved, but it appears as if the legs of this animal were sclerotized before the body (arthropodization vs. arthrodization). One small fossil discovered and yet another small insight into evolutionary history.

 

References

Liu, J., Steiner, M., Dunlop, J., Keupp, H., Shu, D., Ou, Q., Han, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2011). An armoured Cambrian lobopodian from China with arthropod-like appendages Nature, 470 (7335), 526-530 DOI: 10.1038/nature09704

Further reading: A colleagues blog on the lobopodian in Hungarian.

Un anno in rassegna

Oops, sembra che ho perso il mio primo 'blogoversary'! Lunedi 21 è stato il punto di svolta di un anno per il mio blog; e sono incredibilmente felice di aver trascorso l'ultimo anno condividere alcune delle mie divagazioni con tutti voi. I’ve somewhat lost track of how many hits I’ve had since I moved everything over to The Southern Fried Science Network, but it’s more than I ever could have ever imagined as a newbie blogger twelve months ago. When I look over the last year a few posts come to mind as my favorite:

Adela trigrapha (Moth Degustazione in Napa)

Continue reading A Year in Review

I monarchi sono All Right

Incredibilmente, incredibilmente, incredibilmente; gli i monarchi sono tornati (ma non co-fissare Julianne Moore). Ok, non è così sorprendente; Ho praticamente previsto questo sarebbe stato il caso dello scorso marzo, quando tutti correvano terrorizzati perché le farfalle avevano toccato il minimo storico (dall'inizio del conteggio in 1993). In realtà credo che ho detto “Scommetto qualsiasi cosa sulla ripresa della popolazione negli anni a venire…”. Così, che ne dici di qualsiasi cosa = birra, e chi sta comprando?

Forse festeggio un po' in anticipo. Forse le notizie non sono così buone da poter ancora fare un giro della vittoria, ma secondo le indagini preliminari le popolazioni che svernano sono raddoppiate quest'anno. È un buon inizio, ma non abbiamo ancora raggiunto il 18 media annuale (non una statistica impressionante). Ma non fraintendere le mie intenzioni – Non sto affermando che questo anno in qualche modo ha dimostrato che il declino è insignificante. Può o non può essere, tutto ciò che possiamo davvero dire è che è solo un altro punto dati. Il fatto è che il nostro set di dati è molto debole e ci sono fattori come il meteo locale che creano enormi margini di errore. È anche quasi impossibile estrapolare dai pochi dati che abbiamo. Quindi il monarca è molto buono “canarino nella miniera di carbone”?

Direi povero al massimo. In che modo una specie di insetto che si appollaia in enormi colonie singolari è un buon indicatore del nostro ecosistema? Sì, migrano da tutte le regioni del Nord America, ma i loro recenti alti tassi di mortalità non hanno nulla a che fare con le vite che hanno vissuto al di fuori del Messico. Forse se milioni di farfalle morissero a causa di qualche strana tossina, potremmo prestare attenzione all'avvertimento, ma non era così. Quei poveri monarchi sono alla mercé delle tempeste invernali che rischiano di diventare più frequenti con un clima caldo. Quindi possiamo dire che il cambiamento climatico ha un impatto negativo su questi animali? Si scopre che non possiamo, almeno non ancora. Se così fosse, i nostri dati ci dicono che il 1996-1997 la stagione era un luogo davvero salutare dove le nuvole di inquinamento si aprivano e la natura si rallegrava. Fatto il 2010 stagione poi diventa un mondo post-apocalittico in stile Blade Runner in cui la pioggia acida scioglieva l'arancia dalle ali delle farfalle? Chiaramente no. Né il clima né l'inquinamento erano drasticamente diversi in quegli anni. I monarchi hanno appena avuto un anno davvero buono seguito da alcuni davvero pessimi. Forse dovremmo solo trovare un canarino migliore se stiamo cercando di denunciare il riscaldamento globale o la deforestazione.

Come ultimo pensiero, ecco un video dalla storia di cui sopra. Proprio come ti aspetteresti, è troppo drammatizzato e un po' esilarante.

 

Genio della Stampa XVI

Un softball per questa sfida GOP. Questa immagine proviene cura dell'Avvocato Victoria (Carta TX) – con un poorly written article about butterflies. Questo flop di immagine è abbastanza facile, ma per guadagnare punti extra che mi può dire che altro non è corretta nel testo?

 

Nuovo Header

Ho caricato un nuovo header come potete vedere – come si guarda? Sto giocando con le impostazioni, ma per favore fatemi sapere se la falena sulla destra viene ritagliata goffamente, e ciò che la risoluzione dello schermo è se questo è il caso.

Grazie!

Butterflies for Beer

(Credit: David Cappaert, Insectimages.org)

 

If you happen to be living out in Yolo, Solano or Sacramento counties you should head out with a net. Dr.. Art Shaprio has offered for the 40th year his cabbage white butterfly competition. If you are the very first person to catch a cabbage white (Pieris rapae invasive) before Dr. Shapiro he will buy you a pitcher of beer! You have to deliver the specimen alive to the receptionist in the Department of Evolution and Ecology to confirm the identification (I assume to prove you didn’t just save last year’s dead butterfly and cheat).

Over the last 30 years the butterflies have been emerging earliertwo weeks on average now. You better hurry, the first cabbage white of 2010 was collected on January 27th.

Controlla il tuo oroscopo di oggi?

Ho fatto, e suona come se fosse stato scritto da Sarah Palin. Effettivamente, Mi sono imbattuto in questa meta analisi di oltre 22,000 horoscopes over on Information is Beautiful. E 'spettacolare – ma corro giù alcuni punti qui:

Da queste 22,000 oroscopi venuto un grafico delle parole più comuni (fondo), 90% of which happen to be exactly the same regardless of your sign. David McCandless also generated a meta prediction using these most common words. It goes something like this.

Ready? Sure? Whatever the situation or secret moment enjoy everything a lot. Feel able to absolutely care. Expect nothing else. Keep making love. Family and friends matter. The world is life, fun and energy. Maybe hard. Or easy. Taking exactly enough is best. Help and talk to others. Change your mind and a better mood comes along

Everyone, fiduciosamente, should know that horoscopes and astrology have always been steaming piles. Seeing the data like this just makes it that much easier to laugh in the face of wackiness. I also love McCandless’s interpretation of star traits. I’m agemini” (or at least was), and the most common words for me areparty, stay, issues and listen certainly”. Interpreted asemotionally disturbed party animal who never says no”. Love it.

You might have also heard recently about the scandalous story of wrong star assignments. As it turns out our earth wobbles slightly in orbit; meaning the stars are not exactly where they are in the night sky tonight as they were a few millennia ago when the zodiac was first derived. So if the stars mold who you are at birth then they do so based on where they are now and not 2,000 years ago. Surprisemany people should now be assigned to a new sign! Ooooh scandal! The science of astrology didn’t even come close to predicting this (it greatly pained me to even mockingly call astrology science). But that’s OK it won’t perturb them, they are well adapt at dodging hard science and spinning BS, and have been doing so for hundreds of years. Back in 1781 astronomers threw a wrench at the heads of astrologers with the discovery of Uranusand a generation later Neptune appeared on the scene. Oh don’t worry! Astrologers fudged their own numbers, whined about differentcharts and systemsand snuck in two extra star signs to agree with the world as science understood it. Oh, and never mind the rest of the billion, billion stars and planets

Ancora, I can still hear a faint cry down the street here in Berkeleysomeone slaps hand to head and exclaimsoh now it makes sense, I was a Taurus tutti along!”

You should go explore his blog and take a closer look at the analysis. Meglio ancora, if you have a friend who loves their astrology, you should forward this in their direction.

 

 

 

Entomophagy: moths for dinner

This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for ResearchBlogging.org I have always known that in many places of the world, especially off the beaten track, caterpillars of moths and butterflies are on the menu. From Africa a Australia there are dozens of species that might taste good enough to be reasonably edible or even delicious. But here in the US insects rarely if ever make it onto our tables (at least not to our knowledge) – but occasionally into our bottles. I’m sure that many of you have seen the worm at the bottom of the tequila bottle: which is actually the caterpillar of the Cossid moth Hypotpa agavis. I have even heard reports that migrant Mexican workers dig up native plants on their lunch break to snack on the large pink larvae of a related moth; probably in the genus Comadia. Despite my previous knowledge, I was a bit surprised by a recent article discussing the massive diversity of Lepidoptera used as staple food sources throughout Mexico.

(da Wikipedia)

Continue reading Entomophagy: moths for dinner

Genio della stampa XV

Per questo numero il genio della stampa, who can tell me what’s wrong with Questo articolo? È piuttosto sottile, ma un chiaro errore, soprattutto per WordsSideKick.com.