The family Nepticulidae hold some of the smallest moths known, ranging from 3-8mm wing-tip to wing-tip. For a comparison I have imaged two moths above: the largest known – Coscinocera herculesthat tips the scales at nearly 9 inches, and one of the smallest (yes that tiny little speck below the Hercules moth) – Ectoedemia rubifoliella, also imaged below. The Nepticulidae are surprisingly diverse, with over 800 species described that likely represent only 10% of the actual diversity (Powell, 2009). In the United States we have only 80 druh, of which 25 are known from the west. When you compare that diversity to the 100 or so species known from Great Britain, it’s clear that the US knowledge is vastly lacking. V skutočnosti, over 80% of all nepticulid diversity is known from Europe alone. A strange inversion when you consider that the neotropics are the world’s most diverse ecosystems yet have only 74 known Nepticulidae species! (Puplesis, 2000). Why is this so?
Ectoedemia rubifoliella3.3mm
Stigmella ostryaefoliella3.1mm
The European diversity can easily be explained away due to a high concentration of bored Lepidopterists. The Holarctic fauna is not the most diverse and it therefore has become the best understood on the planet, not to mention they have had a long history of gentleman entomologists dating back hundreds of years. But the rest of the Nepticulidae diversity remains a mystery because they are really, naozaj malý, hard to spread, and difficult to identify as adults! I have actually had little practice or success with mounting Nepticulidae, and the above specimens should be credited to Dr. Dave Wagner. The very few that I do have in my collection are simply pinned and un-spread; and even the pinning proves hard enough when a slip of the hand can obliterate the entire specimen. Apparently the best method for mounting is to knock them down in the freezer and pin them while they are still alive. Not the most humane, but the only way to keep the moth from drying before your eyes and becoming impossible to manipulate. As hard as the adults are to manage, the larvae are rather characteristic in that most are leaf miners – they feed on the materialmedzithe leaf epidermises. This lends to the common name of “leaf blotch miners” because you can see the translucent patches the moths have ‘mined’ out from inside the leaf. Not only is each species rather host-specific, but they tend to form very characteristic mine patterns within the leaf. So if you find a leaf mine and you know the species of plant, chances are you can find out the species of Nepticulid within it (however not all leaf mines are nepticulids, there are lots of other insects that do this as well). Rearing these moths are also rather simple, all you have to do is pop the leaf in a bag and wait for the moth to finish feeding. One caterpillar only needs one leaf (or tiny section of leaf) – but care has to be taken to keep the leaf green while the caterpillar feeds. If the leaf dies, so will the caterpillar. Because of this paradoxical ability to identify the mines and not the adults there is a surprising amount of ecological research done on them, especially since a few pose threats to commercial crops. The first image below clearly illustrates the caterpillar feeding within the leaf – and the trail of frass it has left behind.
If you look at the above images of mines it’s not all that difficult to imagine structures like this fossilizing. And amazingly, they have! The first image below (Labandeira et al., 1994) shows a variety of leaf mining Nepticulidae mines (and a Gracillariidae) from the mid-Cretaceous (97 miliónmi rokmi). The spectacular thing about leaf mines is that you can get down to genus level and sometimes even species. The authors were able to differentiate between the nepticulid generaStigmellaa Ectoedemiabased on the patterns preserved in the fossils; patterns we still use to help separate genera today. The bottom illustration is from a mine discovered in Japan that is only around 8 million years old (Kuroko, 1987).
(Labanderia, 1994)
(Kuroko, 1987)
Odkazy
Kuroko, H. (1987). A Fossil Leaf Mine of Nepticulidae (Lepidoptera) from Japan. Bulletin Sugadaira Montane Res. Cen., No.8, 119-121.
Labandeira, C. (1994). Ninety-Seven Million Years of Angiosperm-Insect Association: Paleobiological Insights into the Meaning of CoevolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91 (25), 12278-12282 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12278
PUPLESIS, R., DIŠKUS, A., ROBINSON, G., & ONORE, G. (2002). A review and checklist of the Neotropical Nepticulidae (Lepidoptera) Bulletin of The Natural History Museum. Entomology Series, 71 (01) DOI: 10.1017/S0968045402000032
Powell, J.A., Opler, P.A. (2010). Mory západnej Severnej Ameriky – by J. A. Powell and P. A. OplerSystematic Entomology, 35 (2), 347-347 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00525.x
The early Cambrian seas (542-488 miliónmi rokmi) had a plethora ofstrange and bizarre creaturesalmost unimaginable to even the best sci-fi dreamer. As possibly one of the precursors to the Arthropoda (alsoOnychophora a Tardigrada), the lobopodian lineages represent a strange group of “worms with legs” that once roamed the ancient sea beds. Exactly how close they are to the true arthropods is up for debate (tree below), but this newly discovered genus and species, Diania cactiformis(walking cactus), represents the most well sclerotized and arthropod-like of any known to date.
This whopping two and a half inch monster helps us understand the transition from a soft bodied worm like creature into a hard-shelled arthropod; it also gives a better impression of how diverse these lobopodian appendages may have been. It’s a fascinating question because the advantage of jointed, sclerotized, limbs was one that exploded and diversified amongst the creatures we know today. Exactly how this happened is not any closer to being resolved, but it appears as if the legs of this animal were sclerotized before the body (arthropodization vs. arthrodization). One small fossil discovered and yet another small insight into evolutionary history.
Odkazy
Liu, J., Steiner, M., Dunlop, J., Keupp, H., Shu, D., Ou, Q., Han, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2011). An armoured Cambrian lobopodian from China with arthropod-like appendagesNature, 470 (7335), 526-530 DOI: 10.1038/nature09704
Ojoj, looks like I missed my first ‘blogoversary’! Monday the 21st was the one year turning point for my blog; and I’m incredibly happy to have spent the last year sharing some of my ramblings with all of you. I’ve somewhat lost track of how many hits I’ve had since I moved everything over to The Southern Fried Science Network, but it’s more than I ever could have ever imagined as a newbie blogger twelve months ago. When I look over the last year a few posts come to mind as my favorite:
Shockingly, stunningly, amazingly; themonarchs are back (but not co-staring Julianne Moore). OK, it’s not that amazing; I pretty much predictedthis would be the case last March when everyone was running around terrified because the butterflies hit an all time low (since counting startedv 1993). Actually I believe I said “Stavím čokoľvek na to, že sa populácia v nasledujúcich rokoch zotaví…”. Tak, how about anything = beer, and who’s buying?
Perhaps I am celebrating a bit early. Maybe the news isn’t so good that I can run a victory lap quite yet, but preliminary surveys look like the overwintering populations have doubled this year. That’s a pretty good start, but we still haven’t hit the 18 year average (not an impressive statistic). But don’t misread my intentions – I’m not claiming this one year somehow has proven the decline insignificant. It may or may not be, all we can really say is that it’s just another data point. The fact is that our dataset is very weak and there are factors such as local weather that create massive margins of error. It’s also nearly impossible to extrapolate from what little data we do have. So is the monarch a very good “canary in the coal mine”?
I would say poor at best. How is one insect species that roosts in massive singular colonies a good indicator of our ecosystem? Áno, they migrate from all reaches of North America, but their recent high mortality rates have nothing to do with the lives they lived outside of Mexico. Perhaps if millions of butterflies died of some strange toxin we could heed the warning, but such was not the case. Those poor monarchs are at the mercy of winter storms that are likely to become more frequent with a warming climate. So can we say that climate change is negatively impacting these animals? Turns out we can’t, at least not yet. If this were to be so then our data is telling us that the1996-1997 seasonwas a really healthy one where clouds of pollution parted and nature rejoiced. Did the 2010 season then become a post apocalyptic blade-runner-esque world where acid rain melted the orange off of butterfly wings? Clearly not. Neither climate nor pollution were drastically different in those years. The monarchs just had a really good year followed by some really bad ones. Maybe we should just find a better canary if we’re trying to blow the whistle on global warming or deforestation.
As a last thought here is a video from the above story. Just as you’d expect, it’s over dramatized and a bit hilarious.
Softball na túto výzvu GOP. Tento obrázok je starostlivosť o Victoria advokáta (Papier TX) – s zle napísaný článok o motýľoch. Tento obrázok flop je celkom jednoduché, ale pre extra body, kto mi môže povedať, čo iného je nesprávne v texte?
I’ve uploaded a new header as you can see – how does it look? I’m playing around with the settings, but please let me know if the moth on the right gets cropped awkwardly, and what your screen resolution is if that is the case.
If you happen to be living out in Yolo, Solano or Sacramento counties you should head out with a net. DR. Art Shaprio has offered for the 40th year hiscabbage white butterfly competition. If you are the very first person to catch a cabbage white (Pieris rapae– invasive) before Dr. Shapiro he will buy you a pitcher of beer! You have to deliver the specimenaliveto the receptionist in the Department of Evolution and Ecology to confirm the identification (I assume to prove you didn’t just save last year’s dead butterfly and cheat).
Over the last 30 years the butterflies have been emerging earlier – two weeks on average now. You better hurry, the first cabbage white of 2010 was collected on January 27th.
Urobil som, a to znie, ako by to bolo napísané Sarah Palin. V skutočnosti, Narazil som na tento meta analýzy viac ako 22,000 horoskopy než na Informácia je krásny. Je to nádherný – ale budem kritizovať niekoľko bodov tu:
Z týchto 22,000 horoskopy prišiel graf najčastejších slov (spodný), 90% z toho stalo, že presne rovnaký bez ohľadu na znamenie. David McCandless tiež vytvára meta predikcie pomocou týchto najbežnejších slov. Ide to nejako takto.
“Pripravený? Iste? Nech už je situácia, alebo tajný moment vychutnať všetko, veľa. Pocit moci úplne jedno,. Očakávajte nič iného. Majte milovanie. Rodina a priatelia ohľadu na to,. Svet je život, zábava a energia. Možno ťažké. Alebo ľahko. Užívanie dosť presne je najlepší. Nápoveda a hovoriť s ostatnými. Zmeňte svoju myseľ a lepšia nálada príde…“
Každý, dúfajme, by mali vedieť, že horoskopy a astrológia boli vždy dymiace hromady. Vidieť údaje, ako je to len robí to, že oveľa jednoduchšie sa smiať tvárou v tvár wackiness. Tiež som rád výklad McCandless je hviezdnych vlastností. Som “Blíženci” (alebo aspoň bol), a najčastejšie slová sú pre mňa “strana, pobyt, otázky a počúvať rozhodne”. Interpretovať ako “citovo narušené strana zviera, ktoré nikdy hovorí, že nie”. Milujem to.
Možno ste nedávno počuli o škandalózne príbeh zlých hviezd úloh. Ako to dopadá naša krajina chveje mierne na obežnej dráhe; čo znamená, že hviezdy nie sú presne tam, kde sú na nočnej oblohe dnes, ako boli pred niekoľkými tisícročiami, kedy me prvýkrát odvodený. Takže v prípade, že hviezdy forma, ktorá ste pri narodení a potom sa to tak podľa toho, kde sú teraz, a nie 2,000 Pred rokmi. Prekvapenie – mnoho ľudí by teraz mala byť pridelené nové znamenie! Ooooh škandál! Veda o astrológiu ani priblížiť k predvídaniu to (ma to veľmi bolelo ešte posmešne nazývajú astrológia veda). Ale to je v poriadku, že nebude rušiť ich, sú dobre prispôsobiť uhýbať tvrdú vedu a pradenie BS, a boli pritom za stovky rokov. Späť na 1781 astronómovia hodil kľúče na hlavy astrológov s objavom planéty Urán – a generáciu neskôr Neptún objavil na scéne. Oh nebojte sa! Astrológovia fudged vlastné čísla, zakvičal o iný “grafy a systémy” a Vkradol som sa dvoma prístelkami hviezdnych znamení súhlasiť so svetom ako veda je chápaná. Ach, a nevadí zvyšok miliárd, miliardy hviezd a planét…
Ešte, Stále počujem slabý plač dole na ulici tu v Berkeley – niekto capne rukou do čela a zvolá “oh teraz to dáva zmysel, Bol som Taurus všetky spolu!”
Mali by ste ísť preskúmať jeho blog a pozrime sa bližšie na analýzu. Ešte lepšie, ak máte priateľa, ktorý miluje svoju astrológiu, mali by ste ju postúpi vo svojom smere.
Vždy som vedela, že na mnohých miestach sveta, najmä mimo vychodených cesty, Húsenice motýľov sú v ponuke. Od Afrika na Austrália tam sú desiatky druhov, ktoré by mohli ochutnať dosť dobré, aby to rozumne jedlé, alebo dokonca vynikajúci. Ale tu v hmyzu amerických zriedka, ak vôbec, aby to na našich stoloch (aspoň nie na našich znalostiach) – ale občas do našich fliaš. Som si istý, že mnohí z vás videli červa na dne fľaše tequily: čo je vlastne Húsenica Cossid mora Hypotpa agavis. Počul som správy, že migrujúci pracovníci mexickej vykopať pôvodné rastliny na ich obedňajšej prestávky na občerstvenie na veľké ružové larvy súvisiace mora; pravdepodobne v rodu komédia. Aj cez svoje predchádzajúce znalosti, Bol som trochu prekvapený nedávnom článku diskutovať masívne rozmanitosť motýľov používa ako zdroj základných potravín po celom Mexiku.