ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ໃນວັນທີ 25 ມີນາ, 2010 ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າມາໃນທົ່ວຢ່າງເຕັມທີ່ຂໍ້ຄວາມ PDF ຂອງບົດຄວາມ moth amphibious ແລະສະກັດຕົ້ນໄມ້ສະແດງໃຫ້ເຫັນລັງສີຂອງກຸ່ມຈໍາແນກຊະນິດແລະການ evolution ອາດຈະເປັນການລັກສະນະ amphibious ທີ່. ຫນ້າສົນໃຈທີ່ຈະສັງເກດຮູບຮ່າງກໍລະນີ, ແລະແຕ່ລະ moth ແມ່ນ endemic ກັບພູເຂົາໄຟຂອງຕົນເອງໃນຫມູ່ເກາະຮາວາຍ.
This is a Bayesian analysis of a three gene phylogeny constructed with EF1-alpha, CAD and COI. If anyone wants a copy of the paper, send me a note. Pulled from: ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ, ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ, ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ, ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ, ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ. ແລະອ່ານເພີ່ມເຕີມ 2010.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ໃນວັນທີ 25 ມີນາ, 2010 UR6FVJ2S3B8H
Nothing wrong with established religion…
You can read all about his story from the NY Times. I think the scariest thing about this whole abuse scandal (scandalsssss) is that the church actually believes that this is the work of satan – not the twisted minds of individual humans. Yes, “the Devil is at work inside the Vatican”, so why punish a man who just needs the devil vanquished? Oh wait, they don’t even exorcise priests because it is just a “temptation” with young, deaf, boys. Then how is it that these priests who are so easily tempted left in positions of power? The answer is easy… just like any government, the Catholic church is profoundly incompetent.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ໃນວັນທີ 25 ມີນາ, 2010 ສໍາລັບທຸກຄົນທີ່ງົດການລົງຄະແນນສຽງ (ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າຕ້ອງການທີ່ຈະສົມມຸດວ່າຜູ້ອ່ານຈໍານວນຫນຶ່ງຕ້ອງໄດ້ຮູ້ຈັກຕົວຕົນຂອງ caterpillar ຄວາມລຶກລັບຂອງພວກເຮົາ, ແຕ່ຂີ້ກຽດເກີນໄປທີ່ຈະສະແດງຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ), ນີ້ແມ່ນຄໍາຕອບ (ຫຼັງຈາກພັກຜ່ອນ).
Continue reading Answer to last week’s Genius of the Press
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ໃນວັນທີ 24 ມີນາ, 2010
ແມວເຮັດໃຫ້ປະລາດຈາກຮາວາຍ – a completely amphibious caterpillar (ຈັດພີມມາໃນເດືອນມີນາ 22 PNAS). ໃນຂະນະທີ່ມີນ້ໍາ Lepidoptera ສອງສາມ, ທັງຫມົດຂອງເຂົາເຈົ້າມີກະດູກສັນທີ່ຮັກສາໃຫ້ເຂົາເຈົ້າຈໍາກັດນ້ໍາ (ໃຈທ່ານ, ພວກເຮົາກໍາລັງລົມກັນພຽງແຕ່ກ່ຽວກັບຂັ້ນຕອນຂອງການປ່ຽນແປງ). ຖ້າຫາກວ່ານ້ໍາຂອງເຂົາເຈົ້າ dries ເຖິງ, ສະນັ້ນບໍ່ດ້ວງ. The novel adaptation in these insects is the ability to live comfortably, and apparently indefinitely, on dry land ຫຼື submerged in fresh water – a trait distinctive to these 12 new species of Hyposmocoma (Cosmopterigidae). This is unique not only to Insects, but to all known animals. ມີ, ແນ່ນອນ, amphibians. But unlike these caterpillars they require moisture to survive and often desiccate rapidly. Hyposmocoma thrive in desert like conditions, or submerged for weeks. Not only were 12 different species discovered (that are also the first known caterpillars to eat snails), but it even appears as if this amphibious ability has evolved three separate times. Clearly the selective pressures on small lepidoptera in these areas are extreme.
The Lepidoptera as a whole have evolved a full range of adaptations, including species that are parasitic, detritivorous, fungivorous, endophagous, carnivorous (also on Hawaii), aquatic and now fully amphibious. Hummm, sounds like a bad song (to this music). Clearly, leps are cooler than any other order.
Perhaps if I were Rubinoff I may have named one moth Hyposmocoma aquamana. Of course, Aquaman was pretty worthless on the land… so maybe it should have been ຮ. potioaquamana (potio- coming from the Latin for superior or more effective).
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ໃນເດືອນມີນາວັນທີ 22, 2010
ພາກຮຽນ spring ໄດ້ມາພາກເຫນືອຂອງຄາລີຟໍເນຍແລະ moths ແມ່ນຢູ່ໃນປີກ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ເດີນທາງໄວຂຶ້ນກັບຕາມຕີນພູ Sierra ໃນໄລຍະທ້າຍອາທິດແລະໄດ້ໄປປີນພູເຖິງເປີ້ນພູ steep ຂ້າງເທິງອາເມລິການ້ໍາ. ຂ້າງເທິງແມ່ນຮູບ Xanthothrix ranunculi f. albipuncta (Noctuidae: ສະເຕີຣີນາ). ມັນເກີດຂຶ້ນທີ່ຈະນັ່ງຢູ່ເທິງ poppy california ທີ່ສວຍງາມ. ສວນຄົວ, ຢ່າງໃດກໍຕາມ, ແມ່ນ Coreopsis Stillmanii ແລະເຕີບໃຫຍ່ຢູ່ໃນພື້ນທີ່ນ້ອຍໆຂອງດິນ serpentine ເທິງເປີ້ນພູທີ່ຫັນຫນ້າໄປທາງທິດໃຕ້ຕາມຮ່ອມພູກາງ.. ນີ້ແມ່ນ ກ ແຊນໂທທຣິກ ນັ່ງຢູ່ໃນເຈົ້າພາບ.
moth ນີ້ໄດ້ຖືກອະທິບາຍໃນເບື້ອງຕົ້ນເປັນຮູບແບບຂອງ X. ranunculi ໃນ 1925 (ປະເພດປະມານປະມານເທົ່າທຽມກັນຍ່ອຍໃນມື້ນີ້), ແລະ ຫຼັງ ຈາກ ນັ້ນ ລືມ ຫມົດ ກ່ຽວ ກັບ ແລະ unseen ຈົນ ກ ່ ວາ 1990. ມັນໄດ້ຖືກປະໄວ້ຈາກການປັບປຸງທີ່ສໍາຄັນຂອງ subfamily, ດັ່ງນັ້ນ ສະຖານະທີ່ຖືກຕ້ອງຕາມກົດໝາຍເປັນຊະນິດຍ່ອຍ ຫຼືສາຍພັນເຕັມຍັງບໍ່ຮູ້ຈັກ. ຕິດຕາມຢູ່.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ກ່ຽວກັບທີ 19 ເດືອນມີນາ, 2010 Yet another installment of my favorite series, the genius of the press. This article comes from ABC news, who can identify this caterpillar? It is decidedly ບໍ່ a gypsy moth.
Fellow entomology blogger Myrmecos had a similar story last week.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, ກ່ຽວກັບທີ 19 ເດືອນມີນາ, 2010 (ການປ່ອຍສິນເຊື່ອຮູບພາບ)
monarchs ໄດ້ ເລີ່ມ ຕົ້ນ ການ ເຄື່ອນ ຍ້າຍ ພາກ ຮຽນ spring ພາກ ເຫນືອ ຂອງ ເຂົາ ເຈົ້າ ແລະ ທ່ານ ອາດ ຈະ ເບິ່ງຫນຶ່ງໃນໄວໆນີ້ (ບໍ່ຕື່ນເຕັ້ນຖ້າຫາກວ່າທ່ານອາໄສຢູ່ໃນ FL ຫຼື HI ບ່ອນທີ່ມີອາໃສໄດ້ຕະຫຼອດປີມີ, ຫຼືຢູ່ໃນ CA ບ່ອນທີ່ມີຢາດ overwintering ແຍກຕ່າງຫາກ). ບົດລາຍງານຈາກສະຖານທີ່ລະດູຫນາວຂອງເຂົາເຈົ້າຢູ່ໃນເມັກຊິໂກຢ່າງໃດກໍຕາມມີ dismal; ໂດຍອາດຈະເປັນຂະຫນາດປະຊາກອນຕໍ່າສຸດນັບຕັ້ງແຕ່ອານານິຄົມໄດ້ຖືກຄົ້ນພົບໃນປີ 70s. ພາຍຸທີ່ບໍ່ດີສອງສາມຄັ້ງໃນ ແລະຕາມເສັ້ນທາງຂອງຜີເສື້ອ, ບວກກັບການແບ່ງແຍກທີ່ຢູ່ອາໄສ ແລະການຕັດໄມ້, ອາດຈະຖືກຂ້າຕາຍ 50-60% ຂອງປະຊາກອນປະຊາຊົນປະຊາຊົນເມັກຊິໂກ (ອີງຕາມບົດລາຍງານຂ້າງລຸ່ມນີ້).
(ສິນເຊື່ອ)
ນີ້ແມ່ນຫຍັງພິເສດທີ່ຈະເປັນຫ່ວງ? ຂ້ອຍບໍ່ຄິດໂດຍສະເພາະ. ສະພາບອາກາດແມ່ນຜູ້ຫຼິ້ນທີ່ສໍາຄັນໃນປະຫວັດສາດປະຊາກອນຕ່ໍາຂອງປີນີ້, ແລະຂ້ອຍສາມາດຈິນຕະນາການໄດ້ວ່າຜີເສື້ອໄດ້ເຫັນຕົວເລກທີ່ບໍ່ດີນີ້ກ່ອນທີ່ມະນຸດຈະນັບພວກມັນ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າຈະວາງເດີມພັນໃດຫນຶ່ງກ່ຽວກັບປະຊາກອນທີ່ເຮັດໃຫ້ການຟື້ນຕົວໃນປີຂ້າງຫນ້າ, ບໍ່ຈໍາເປັນຕ້ອງແລ່ນອ້ອມສຽງຮ້ອງ, ກະສັດຈະຢູ່ໃນສວນຂອງເຈົ້າໃນລະດູຮ້ອນນີ້ແລະຕໍ່ໄປ.
Monarchs ແມ່ນງາມແລະເດັກນ້ອຍຮັກເຂົາເຈົ້າ, ສະນັ້ນມັນບໍ່ໃຊ້ເວລາຫຼາຍຂອງການຈິນຕະນາການທີ່ຈະຄິດອອກວ່າເປັນຫຍັງຄວາມພະຍາຍາມຫຼາຍດັ່ງນັ້ນຈຶ່ງເອົາໃຈໃສ່ໃນການຕິດຕາມເຂົາເຈົ້າ.. ແຕ່ເປັນ lepidoptist ເປັນ, ບໍ່ມີຫຍັງແມ່ນຫນ້າເບື່ອເປັນຍັງລາຍງານກ່ຽວກັບການ “ສະພາວະ” ຂອງກະສັດ Zzzzzzzzzzz. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າມີແນວໂນ້ມທີ່ຈະເຊື່ອວ່າມີບັນຫາກົດດັນຫຼາຍທີ່ຈະເປັນຫ່ວງ, ເຊັ່ນ: ອັດຕາການເລັ່ງຂອງການສູນເສຍຊີວະນາໆພັນທີ່ປະເຊີນກັບຄວາມບໍ່ຮູ້ທາງວິທະຍາສາດ. ກະສັດມີບົດບາດສໍາຄັນໃນຖານະເປັນ mascot ສາທາລະນະແລະເຖິງແມ່ນວ່າເປັນສັດທີ່ມີຮູບຊົງທີ່ຊ່ວຍຮັກສາທີ່ຢູ່ອາໄສອັນມີຄ່າ. – ແຕ່ໃຫ້ພວກເຮົາໃຊ້ພວກມັນເປັນຕີນໃນປະຕູສໍາລັບການສຶກສາຕໍ່ໄປ. Yes, ໄດ້ ກອງທຶນ Monarch Butterfly, ແມ່ນຄວາມພະຍາຍາມເພື່ອປົກປັກຮັກສາທີ່ຢູ່ອາໄສ ແລະຍືນຍົງ. ເປັນສິ່ງທີ່ດີ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າເຂົ້າໃຈວ່ານີ້ບັນລຸຜົນໄດ້ຮັບໃນທາງບວກ, ແຕ່ເປັນຫຍັງພຽງແຕ່ໃນນາມຂອງ monarch ໄດ້? ນີ້ເບິ່ງຄືວ່າເປັນໂອກາດທີ່ຫນ້າປະທັບໃຈສໍາລັບການສຶກສາວິທະຍາສາດທີ່ພຽງແຕ່ຖືກລວບລວມລົງ “ຊ່ວຍປະຢັດ monarch ໄດ້”. ປ່າໄມ້ເຫຼົ່ານີ້ເຮັດໃຫ້ຫຼາຍກວ່າທີ່ພັກອາໄສຂອງ butterfly ຊະນິດຫນຶ່ງແລະຫຼາຍກ່ວາ “ອ່າງລ້າງຄາບອນທີ່ສຳຄັນ ແລະເຄື່ອງສ້າງອົກຊີເຈນ”.
ການຕີຄວາມຂອງຂ້ອຍ.
ແທນທີ່ຈະ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າແນະນໍານີ້. ມັນແມ່ນຢູ່ໄກ, ຄໍາສັ່ງຂອງຂະຫນາດ, ຫນ້າສົນໃຈຫຼາຍ:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v = eGYAMDGMraA&hl = en_US&fs=1&]
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, on March 13th, 2010 Published in the Santa Barbara News Press, Winter 2009. Who can tell me what’s wrong with these captions?
Page scan credit: Stuart Wilson.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, on March 13th, 2010 As if educational standards weren’t bad enough in this country, Texas has decided to make them worse. A recent push from a conservative school board has re-written history, literally. The logic may be a bit difficult to follow, but they have attempted to “balance” history by injecting more conservative ideals (ໃຈທ່ານ, no one is a historian on the board). What is to be changed:
- Adding confusion on separation of church and state – (ແມ່ນ, we know it’s not literally in the constitution. Doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.)
- Discussing how christian ideals helped to found our country.
- Conservative resurgence in the 80’s and 90’s, including the Moral Majority and the NRA.
- Discussing the violent nature of some civil rights movements and republican support of congressional civil rights votes.
- Adding that Germans and Italians were interned as well, not just the Japanese during WWII.
- Adding how senator McCarthy was correct in being paranoid over communism.
- Replacing the word “capitalism” with “free-market enterprise”.
- Removal of Thomas Jefferson from sections of the book.
This entire change is ghastly. I don’t have a problem mentioning some republican presidents and their positive role in history, or the role of the GOP. History may be written by the victors, but it should strive towards fair and balanced. The alterations made above are absolute bullshit and only serve to further their conservative, religious, agenda. What really pisses me off is the alteration of the civil rights movement and Japanese internment. Just because a bunch of old, fat, white men in congress realized they better pass civil rights laws does not mean they should deserve credit for it. ແລະ, are they really expecting us to believe that internment was not focused on the Japanese? That entire chapter in our US history is undeniably horrible and shameful, it was also fueled by racism. I do not understand how supporting bigotry and racism is considered a conservative value. Why must they unashamedly, and ignorantly, re-write history to further their agenda? The poisoning of the GOP and conservative values by religion is all to clear in this case. The bread and butter of religious fundamentalism is inculcating the youth. This strategy is very successful when you encourage large families and insane devotion. Now that the majority of conservatives are religious they are spinning their webs onto our children (ດີ, your children).
The worst is yet to come. Texas and California are the largest textbook markets in the country. If they pass legislation mandating the alteration of texts then the publishing companies must fall into line. Since printing different versions of books for different states is financially unfeasible, then only ONE book gets printed for US schools. If Texas successfully adds this BS to the history books then every public school in the US gets force fed (or as republicans like to say – rammed down our throats) these books.
What is a conservative today if not religious? What is coming next: insertion of more “balanced” ideals of global warming, cloning and evolutionary biology. ຕິດຕາມຢູ່.
Fail to Texas.
ໂດຍຄຣິດສ Grinter, on March 10th, 2010 I post someone else’s. Came across this series in a PZ Myers lecture, pretty entertaining and you should go check out Mr. Deity yourself.
[crackle src=/p/Mr._Deity/Mr._Deity_and_the_Messages.swf&fv=id=2021384&mu=0&ap=0]
|
ບໍ່ຄ່ອຍເຊື່ອງ່າຍໆ
|