Крис Grinter, 25 марта, 2010 Я наткнулся на полный текст PDF амфибии моли статьи и извлек дерево, отображающее излучение этой видовой группы и вероятное развитие земноводных черт. Интересно отметить форму случая, и каждая моль является эндемическим заболеванием своего собственного вулкана Гавайского архипелага.
This is a Bayesian analysis of a three gene phylogeny constructed with EF1-alpha, CAD and COI. If anyone wants a copy of the paper, send me a note. Pulled from: Рубинов Д., Шмитц П., Множественные водные инвазии эндемичного, земной, Радиация гавайской бабочки. ПНАС март 2010.
Крис Grinter, 25 марта, 2010 UR6FVJ2S3B8H
Ничего плохого в установленной религии…
You can read all about his story from the NY Times. Я думаю, что самая страшная вещь об этом всей злоупотребления скандала (scandalsssss) является то, что церковь на самом деле считает, что это дело рук сатаны – не искаженные умы отдельных людей. Да, “the Devil is at work inside the Vatican”, so why punish a man who just needs the devil vanquished? Oh wait, they don’t even exorcise priests because it is just a “temptation” with young, deaf, boys. Then how is it that these priests who are so easily tempted left in positions of power? The answer is easy… just like any government, the Catholic church is profoundly incompetent.
Крис Grinter, 25 марта, 2010 Для всех тех, кто воздержался от голосования (Я хочу взять на себя некоторые читатели, должно быть, известно, личность нашей загадочной гусеницы, но были слишком ленивы, чтобы комментировать), вот ответ (после перерыва).
Continue reading Answer to last week’s Genius of the Press
Крис Grinter, 24 марта, 2010 
Еще один удивительный животных с Гавайских островов – a completely amphibious caterpillar (опубликованы в марте 22 PNAS). В то время как есть несколько водных чешуекрылых, все они имеют жабры, которые удерживают их ограничивается воды (заметьте, мы говорим только о личиночной стадии). Если их поток иссякает, так же гусеница. The novel adaptation in these insects is the ability to live comfortably, and apparently indefinitely, on dry land или submerged in fresh water – a trait distinctive to these 12 new species of Hyposmocoma (Cosmopterigidae). This is unique not only to Insects, but to all known animals. Есть, конечно, amphibians. But unlike these caterpillars they require moisture to survive and often desiccate rapidly. Hyposmocoma thrive in desert like conditions, or submerged for weeks. Not only were 12 different species discovered (that are also the first known caterpillars to eat snails), but it even appears as if this amphibious ability has evolved three separate times. Clearly the selective pressures on small lepidoptera in these areas are extreme.
The Lepidoptera as a whole have evolved a full range of adaptations, including species that are parasitic, detritivorous, fungivorous, endophagous, carnivorous (also on Hawaii), aquatic and now fully amphibious. Hummm, sounds like a bad song (to this music). Ясно, leps are cooler than any other order.
Perhaps if I were Rubinoff I may have named one moth Hyposmocoma aquamana. Конечно, Aquaman was pretty worthless on the land… so maybe it should have been H. potioaquamana (potio- coming from the Latin for superior or more effective).
Крис Grinter, 22 марта, 2010
Весна пришла в северной Калифорнии и моли на крыло. Я взял быструю поездку до предгорьях Сьерра в минувшие выходные и путешествовали пешком по крутым склонам над Американ-Ривер. Above is pictured Xanthothrix ranunculi f. albipuncta (Совки: Stiriinae). It happens to be sitting on a beautiful california poppy. The hostplant, однако, является Coreopsis stillmanii and grows in small patches of serpentine soils on southern facing slopes along the central valley. Вот Xanthothrix sitting on the host.
This moth was originally described as a form of Икс. ranunculi в 1925 (form roughly equals subspecies today), and then completely forgotten about and unseen until 1990. It was left out of a major revision of the subfamily, so the legitimate status as a subspecies or full species remains unknown. Следите за обновлениями.
Крис Grinter, 19-го марта, 2010 Еще один взнос из моих любимых серий, гений прессы. Эта статья взята из новости АВС, кто может определить этот гусеницу? Это решительно НЕ непарный мотылек.
коллега-блогер по энтомологии Myrmecos была похожая история на прошлой неделе.
Крис Grinter, 19-го марта, 2010  (кредит фотографии)
The monarchs have started their spring migration north and you might even see one soon (не интересно, если вы живете в FL или HI, где есть жители круглый год, или в ЦА, где есть отдельные зимовки пятна). Сообщения из их расположения зимних в Мексике, однако, мрачный; with possibly the lowest population size since the colonies were discovered in 70’s. A few bad storms in and along the butterfly’s route, coupled with habitat fragmentation and logging, has probably killed 50-60% of the mexican monarch population (according to reports below).
 (credit)
Is this anything special to be concerned about? I don’t particularly think so. Weather was the key player in this year’s record low population, and I can imagine the butterflies have seen numbers this bad before us humans were around to count them. I will bet anything on the population making a recovery in the years to come, no need to run around screaming, the monarch will be in your garden this summer and next.
Monarchs are pretty and kids love them, so it doesn’t take a stretch of the imagination to figure out why so much effort is put into monitoring them. But as a lepidopterist, nothing is as boring as yet another report on the “plight” of the monarchs Zzzzzzzzzzzz. I tend to believe there are more pressing issues to be concerned about, such as the accelerating rate of biodiversity loss in the face of scientific ignorance. Monarchs do play an important role as a public mascot and even as a figurehead species that help preserve precious habitat – but let’s use them as a foot in the door for further education. Да, the Monarch Butterfly Fund, is striving for habitat protection and sustainability. A good thing. I understand that this achieves a positive outcome, but why only in the name of the monarch? This seems like a spectacular opportunity for science education that is just rounded down to “save the monarch”. These forests serve as much more than a shelter to one butterfly species and even more than “an important carbon sink and oxygen generator”.
My interpretation.
Instead I suggest this. It is by far, orders of magnitude, more interesting:
[youtube = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGYAMDGMraA&hl = en_US&fs = 1&]
Крис Grinter, on March 13th, 2010 Published in the Santa Barbara News Press, Winter 2009. Who can tell me what’s wrong with these captions?
Page scan credit: Stuart Wilson.
Крис Grinter, on March 13th, 2010 As if educational standards weren’t bad enough in this country, Texas has decided to make them worse. A recent push from a conservative school board has re-written history, literally. The logic may be a bit difficult to follow, but they have attempted to “balance” history by injecting more conservative ideals (заметьте, no one is a historian on the board). What is to be changed:
- Adding confusion on separation of church and state – (да, we know it’s not literally in the constitution. Doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.)
- Discussing how christian ideals helped to found our country.
- Conservative resurgence in the 80’s and 90’s, including the Moral Majority and the NRA.
- Discussing the violent nature of some civil rights movements and republican support of congressional civil rights votes.
- Adding that Germans and Italians were interned as well, not just the Japanese during WWII.
- Adding how senator McCarthy was correct in being paranoid over communism.
- Replacing the word “capitalism” with “free-market enterprise”.
- Removal of Thomas Jefferson from sections of the book.
This entire change is ghastly. I don’t have a problem mentioning some republican presidents and their positive role in history, or the role of the GOP. History may be written by the victors, but it should strive towards fair and balanced. The alterations made above are absolute bullshit and only serve to further their conservative, religious, agenda. What really pisses me off is the alteration of the civil rights movement and Japanese internment. Just because a bunch of old, fat, white men in congress realized they better pass civil rights laws does not mean they should deserve credit for it. И, are they really expecting us to believe that internment was not focused on the Japanese? That entire chapter in our US history is undeniably horrible and shameful, it was also fueled by racism. I do not understand how supporting bigotry and racism is considered a conservative value. Why must they unashamedly, and ignorantly, re-write history to further their agenda? The poisoning of the GOP and conservative values by religion is all to clear in this case. The bread and butter of religious fundamentalism is inculcating the youth. This strategy is very successful when you encourage large families and insane devotion. Now that the majority of conservatives are religious they are spinning their webs onto our children (хорошо, your children).
The worst is yet to come. Texas and California are the largest textbook markets in the country. If they pass legislation mandating the alteration of texts then the publishing companies must fall into line. Since printing different versions of books for different states is financially unfeasible, then only ONE book gets printed for US schools. If Texas successfully adds this BS to the history books then every public school in the US gets force fed (or as republicans like to say – rammed down our throats) these books.
What is a conservative today if not religious? What is coming next: insertion of more “balanced” ideals of global warming, cloning and evolutionary biology. Следите за обновлениями.
Fail to Texas.
Крис Grinter, on March 10th, 2010 I post someone else’s. Came across this series in a PZ Myers lecture, pretty entertaining and you should go check out Mr. Deity yourself.
[crackle src=/p/Mr._Deity/Mr._Deity_and_the_Messages.swf&fv=id=2021384&mu=0&ap=0]
|
Скептицизм
|
комментарии закрыты 
