Zoals ik weet zeker dat je hebt gemerkt dingen zijn erg stil geweest hier in de buurt voor de laatste twee maanden. Het grootste deel van januari was ik bezig met een verhuizing, van San Francisco naar Chicago. Helaas is de stichting die mijn werk steunde op de California Academy of Sciences heeft een aantal moeilijke financiële oproepen te maken en mijn positie werd stopgezet. Extra ontslagen bij het CAS alleen betekende dat er was geen manier voor mij om te verblijven in het museum – dat is de efemere wereld van de financiering van onderzoek. Ik zal de geweldige vrienden missen die ik gemaakt heb en het prachtige landschap van Californië, vier jaar vliegt zeker door in een flits. Zonder twijfel zal ik iets in de niet al te verre toekomst te vinden (als jij iets laat het me weten!). In de tussentijd kan ik mij richten op het experimenteren met mijn fototoestel en het krijgen van die manuscripten gedaan die zijn opknoping rond veel te lang.
Lente / tornado seizoen is net om de hoek hier in Chicago en ik denk dat het veilig om te zeggen scènes als deze zijn een ding van het verleden. Stay tuned voor regelmatige updates, nieuwe foto's, en waar ik misschien verhuizen naar volgende!
The first annualNationale Moth Weekwill be this summer, July 23-29, 2012! This is the first event of its kind in the US (it has been popularin the UKfor quite some time) and is an attempt to encourage people to head outside and explore their often overlooked moth fauna. The US has an impressive moth diversity with over 11,000 described species, most of which people can’t name two of. As a citizen science project there will be teams of people submitting their records (photographs or lists) of moths found in yards across the country. If you read this blog you probably have enough interest to participate! This maplists events that are currently registered – have one in your area? Contact that person and join in! There is alsoveelof room to set up your own event. I’ll register in a few months when I figure out where I’ll be, but you can count on it being BYOB (beerisa critical field supply).
Coincidentally the Moth Week corresponds with thelepidopterists’ Society National Meetingbeing held this year in Denver, Colorado. Natuurlijk, everyone will be headed out at night to look for moths. If you’re in Denver and want to see what it is we do, please get a hold of me, I will probably be attending the meeting this year.
Fellow network bloggerDavid Shiffmanis in the final laps of a $10,000 scholarship challenge. The money will not only support David’s blogging at Southern Fried Science, but shark conservation research (including a contest to name the shark he will tag with the funds). Take a moment andvote for him, once every 24 uur! He is currently in the lead with a decent %3 margin, let’s keep it that way.
For all intents and purposes this looks like a blue butterfly (as in subfamily Polyommatinae)… it’s very, very blue after all. But assumptions based on color would lead you down the incorrect road; as it turns out this butterfly is actually a species copper. There are subtle difference in wing shape and probably venation, but when I first saw these butterflies I assumed they were a sub-species ofPlebejus icarioides (die werealsoflying at this location on the Kaibab Plateau). But then I began seeing female butterflies (onder) interacting with these blues and then it dawned on me – blue copper – Lycaena heteronea austin (Lycaenidae: Lycaeninae)!
This subspecies was originally described in 1998 by the late, groot George T. AustinasDe. heteronea rutila. Given however thatrutilamore or less =rutilus, it was later determinedrutilawas actually unavailable and the subspecies name was changed toaustinin honor of George.
I’ve just returned from the annualEntomologische Society of Americaconference in Reno, Nevada! It’s the largest meeting of its kind in the world, with over 4,000 attendees from all walks of insect research life. My interests are in the systematics, evolution and biodiversity talks – and I’ll try to recap a few of the fascinating presentations I attended over the next few weeks.
Of particular note was a wonderful talk given by the acclaimed bug blogger, bug Girl! It was wonderful to meet her in person and hear about her own experiences as a blogger. I encourage you to watch the draft of her talk yourself, if you haven’t already!
We should all celebrate this day with an act of science or skepticism. Plant the seed of inquiry and critical thinking, or take a moment to broaden your own horizons. I was up before dawn this morning and watched the morning stars fade behind the light of the rising sun. It brought to mind my elementary school science classroom and the scratchy VHS recordings of Cosmos we frequently watched. I have since been rapt by the wonder of our universe and our place amongst the stars.
Everyone is likely familiar with the standard model for a moth or butterfly – a straw-like proboscis to reach nectar hidden within flowers. The vast majority of the Lepidoptera have diversified alongside the radiation of angiosperm plants, becoming one of the most diverse and abundant orders of life on earth. This paradigm however does not apply to the Micropterigidae, which represent not only the most basal lineage of the Lepidoptera, but are one of three families that have retained mandibles for grinding pollen or spores and rely on bryophytes, decaying organic matter or fungi as a larval host. Prior assumptions as to the diversity of this group were based on the vast age of the lineage (110 million years) and a buildup of ancient genera. Een recent paper on the Japanese speciesof Micropterigidae by Yume Imada and her colleagues at Kyoto University provides evidence to the contrary and applies molecular techniques to test the hypothesis of allopatric speciation without niche shift.
The authors traveled to 46 localities across the Japanese archipelago and collected all 16 known endemic species, a few new species, and quite possibly a new genus. Finding these moths in the wild is not all that difficult if you know how to find the habitat and how not to fall off slippery rocks; but once you do find the spot the moths can be abundant. Micropterigidae are unsurprisingly associated with their bryophytes, which occur in moist habitats along streams and rivers. The very nature of a minute and slow moving animal in isolated pockets lends itself to allopatric speciation. Many microlepidoptera barely fly off of their host plant and even when they do they are not known for long distance dispersal. While the majority of genera and species are completely isolated across Japan there are a few instances where the genusParamartyriaoccurs within populations ofIssikiomartyria.While it is unknown precisely how these species might partition their host resources it is very likely to be a temporal difference in life-cycles. Here in California there is a vastly confusing complex ofApodemiabutterflies that comprise a handful of species and (of course) subspecies that are partitioned on the same plant by spring and fall breeding seasons.
Impressively, every micropterigid collected as larvae were found only on theConocephalum conicumspecies of liverwort, in spite of there being up to fourteen other bryophyte species available in the same habitat. It had been long understood that the Asian Micropterigidae fed on liverworts, but the extent of their host specificity had never been quantified. Feeding behavior appears to be the same across all of the surveyed species, with caterpillars grazing along the top of the bryophytes consuming the upper tissue layers.
Phylogenetic analysis of the COI, 18S and EF-1α genes generated highly congruent trees using multiple analytical methods. It appears that the endemic Japanese genera and theConocephalumfeeding strategy form a well supported monophyletic clade (in green). In het kort, the radiation of the host-specific Micropterigidae coincide with the separation, uplift, and isolation of the Japanese landmass roughly 20 miljoen jaar geleden. It could not have been difficult to propose the hypothesis that the diversity of the Japanese Micropterigidae could only be as old as the island itself; and it’s also an accepted fact today that allopatric speciation happens more commonly than once thought. But quantifying these theories and explaining how and why this happens is exactly what science is about.
Literature Cited
Imada Y, Kawakita A, & Kato M (2011). Allopatric distribution and diversification without niche shift in a bryophyte-feeding basal moth lineage (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae). Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society, 278 (1721), 3026-33 PMID: 21367790
Scoble, MJ. (1992). de Lepidoptera: Vorm, function, and diversity. Oxford Univ. Press.
That’s how the saying goes, rechts? Two weeks ago I participated in the 5th annualNational Geographic BioBlitzover in Saguaro National Park in Tucson, Arizona. It was a great excuse to get back into the field and it was the first time I collected Arizona in the fall. Temps were still pushing the mid 90’s but things had been dry and the impressive abundance of the monsoon season was long gone. In total my moth colleagues and I collected around 140 species of Lepidoptera, 56 of which were microleps! Sadly though it seems that either other insects were far and few inbetween, or other entomology teams didn’t carefully tally everything they saw. Enkel en alleen 190 arthropods were counted in total – we lost to vascular plants (325 soorten) and even fungi (205)!
Hier is een short interviewwith me in aechthot tent with lots of kids (who must have given me this cold I now have). Perhaps my wild estimate of a possible 15,000 species in the US is on the high side, but it’s notonmogelijk.
Another huge Australian “microlep”, (waarschijnlijk) Maroga setiotricha: Xylorictidae – measuring in at 60mm. With wings like this they must make formidable fliers. According to the Xyloryctinae Moths of Australia blog the larvae are stem borers intoAcaciasp. (Mimosaceae). This specimen was collected in November of 1962 by Ed Ross in Canoona, Queensland.
CNN has now jumped on the bandwagon of FOX-esque bashing of scientific funding. Reporter Erin Burnett “rapporten” on the federal funding of $5.7 million dollars to help fight the invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys). Burnett’s sarcasm is nearly thick enough to break into SNL levels of ridiculousness, but she seems genuine in her distain for this story. It’s clear that in her mind the $5.7mil has been wasted on methods to keep these bugs away from overly sensitive suburbanites and out of your hair. A quick Google search for this insect yields a veryinformative page from PennStateas result #1, and it even has great images of the damage these bugs can cause to crops. Back in reality, it is not surprising that the government would fund research on a potentially critical new invasive species, one that has already proven to be highly destructive to some of our nations most important (en lucratief) crops.