Monday Moth

% title

Schinia villosa

 

This Monday’s moth is a duo of Schinia villosa (Noctuidae) resting on what I am assuming is their host plant (Erigeron sp.).  I snapped this shot around 9,000 feet up on the Kaibab plateau in Northern Arizona last month.  A fire must have burned the area a few years ago because the wildflowers were thick amongst charred remains of ponderosa pines and these moths were everywhere.

Insects of the Philippines I

A month ago or so the California Academy of Sciences launched a full fledged expedition to the Philippines.  While the majority of the cash was spent on a clipper ship and dive teams, there was a terrestrial component.  While I didn’t get to go (and sat at home and pouted), I did talk some of my spider colleagues into collecting lepidoptera for me.  Rarely do I say this, but they did a wonderful job collecting leps, and I am slowly working through their bounty (thanks to Nataliya, Vanessa and Hannah!).  Here is one of the few butterflies they caught – and I’m thinking this even came into light since it was packed with the moths (which butterflies occasionally do).  This stunning Lycaenidae is Catapaecilma evansi, identified by David (indowings) over on InsectNet, thanks!

% title

Catapaecilma evansi (Lycaenidae)

Monday Moth

Last week Jim Hayden guessed the moth I posted was an Australian Oecophoridae.  It was a good guess because there are so many large and stunning moths in this family from Australia.  One of the best has to be this one, Wingia lambertella (Oecophoridae), captured on Black Mountain in Canberra October 23, 1955 (CAS collections).  The larvae feed on Eucalyptus – and I for one wish this was an introduced species here.  We have these pesky invasive trees everywhere, why not the moth to go with?

% title

Wingia lambertella (Oecophoridae)

 

Genius of the Press XX

This GOP is less of a challenge and more of a simple roundup of miserable stock photography.  Alex Wild and others have long ago pointed out the massive failings of many stock photo sites – but here is a brief and painful lep roundup using Google.

Step 1:  Image search “moth on flower”.

Step 2:  Facepalm.

Here is a caption of the first page of results.  Excluding the photos that have no moths and are “moth flowers” (= Phalaenopsis orchids) – only 4 out of 18 images are correct!  I might give you 6/18 if you count two obviously staged photos… but here is my list of reasons starting with 1= top left and 26 = bottom right. (list below)

1) OK, good start!  This looks like a Manduca species (Sphingidae) feeding on a Datura flower.  I’ve seen this myself in the wild – great capture!

2) Orchid

3) Downhill we go.  Obviously a butterfly – Phoebis species (Pieridae).

4) Lycaenidae butterfly – Callophrys species.

5) Hesperiidae – skipper butterfly.

6) Another moth!  Looks like an Autographa species (Noctuidae).

7) Certainly a moth, however something I’m unfamiliar with.

8 ) Hyles sphinx moth nectaring.  Blurry, but a moth!

9) Another skipper.  Just because it’s brown doesn’t mean it’s a moth.

10) Orchid

11) Luna moth on flower.  OK, yes it’s a moth – but I’m sorry, a pretty obviously staged photograph.  Actias luna does not have mouthparts – you’d never find one willingly sitting on a flower.

12) Yet another skipper butterfly.

13) Orchid

14) Vanessa butterfly!  I thought the Painted Lady was about as obvious of a butterfly as possible.

15)  Orchid

16) Orchid

17) Pieridae butterfly on a flower.

18) Orchid

19) Cisseps moth (Arctiinae) – our last real moth photograph.  The webpage has it identified as Pyromorpha dimidiata (Zygaenidae), however the antennae are wrong and this is most likely a tiger moth in the Ctenuchinae.

20) Oh come on, butterfly!  Polygonia species.

21) Moth – but, staged…  I’ve never come across a Sphingidae resting on a flower like this.  While this family readily nectars at flowers, they don’t tend to sit on them like idiots.

22) Orchid

23) Orchid

24) Butterfly, Phyciodes species.

25) Worst staged photograph ever.  It’s a spread specimen that may or may not have been photoshopped onto the flower (it looks wonky).  Broken antennae, torn up wings…  You can also see the shadow from the camera strap on the moth’s left forewing.  Yet somehow it won a medal from some group on Flickr.

26) Same butterfly as 24, in color.

 

Phew, horrible exercise over.

Monday Moth

ANSWER:  This wasn’t easy – but this large and beautiful moth was from Australia and is in the family Xyloryctidae (Philarista sp.).  We have a handful of representatives of this group here in the US and Ted MacRae over on Beetles in the Bush has a few great photographs of them.  Somehow I think we got the short end of the stick because this family reaches the peak of its staggering diversity in Australia.  It’s amazing to me that this animal is related to the tiny grey flower moths we have!

Jim Hayden was closest with the guess of an Australian Oecophorid – which I have photographed for next week.

If you’re interested in learning more about this family go check out the Xyloryctine Moths of Australia blog!

 

This week I’m going to make the moth into a challenge.  Who can tell me what family this is?  Any takers on genus/species?  My only hint is that this is a pretty hefty sized moth measuring in at over 53mm and it’s from the California Academy collections.

 

Net-Winged Beetle

These large and interesting Lycidae beetles (Lycus fernandezi) were abundant in south eastern Arizona a few weeks ago.   Constantly flying between flowers and moist sand they were making for easy photography targets.  I thought to myself “here is a great opportunity to catch a beetle taking off!”.

Wait for it…

% title

Lycus fernandezi (Lycidae)

 

Wait for it…

% title

Lycus fernandezi (Lycidae)

Crap.

% title

Lycus fernandezi (Lycidae)

If it hadn’t been 105 degrees out and I didn’t have a cloud of flies clinging to my face I would have fixed my camera settings and waited for another chance.  But this is all my patience could bear – after all it’s just a beetle!

Dancing Moth

Here is another wonderful video from Warren!  I am guessing this is a Choreutidae because of the way the wings are held while dancing – although it’s too fast to really get a clear look.  Given that it’s from a fauna I’m totally unfamiliar with I could easily be wrong – so please correct me if you know better.

NABA Turns Fish and Wildlife into Brainless Zombies

Fresh off the presses, the Miami Blue Butterfly (MBB) is now listed as federally endangered by act of an emergency provision.  Huzzah!  (right?)

% title

Miami Blue Butterfly from Butterflies of America

My first thought was “wait, wasn’t this already endangered?”.  Yes, turns out the MBB has been state-endangered since 2002 after a previous emergency petition filed by the North American Butterfly Association (NABA).  This measure seemed comprehensive enough since this butterfly occurs nowhere else in the USA.  But that’s not an important detail and I don’t see any real harm in federally listing another butterfly.  The Florida Keys sure need every ounce of help they can get when it comes to protecting the environment.

As an endangered species the Miami Blue (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri) is a northern range extension of a species that commonly occurs throughout the Caribbean.  Whether or not the US immigrant is truly distinctive enough to warrant a subspecies of its own is not something I can really address since I’m not a butterfly guy in the least.  I do greatly shy away from the entire idea of a subspecies, but hey, I guess these butterfly guys need something to do!  It also seems logical to me that influxes of emigrating blues would naturally change in abundance over the southern coast of Florida.  In the early 1950’s these insects used to be abundant up and down beaches nearly all over the state.  The last 60 odd years have been cruel to Florida – development and mosquito abatement has ravaged what used to be pristine habitat.  All of the butterflies are suffering.

Then I realized there was something very odd about this announcement: the emergency provision is also listing all similar blues that share habitat with the MBB as threatened and therefore protected!  Why?  Because they look like the MBB.  These blues include the Cassius blue (Leptotes cassius), Ceraunus blue (Hemiargus ceraunus), and the Nickerbean blue (Cyclargus ammon).  Let’s get one thing straight – both the Cassius and Ceraunus blues are not in any way actually threatened nor even rare.  They can both be – incredibly abundant species with a range that spans all of the Carribbean, the gulf coast west to California and inland strays to the midwest!

So I ask, how could this have passed?

% title

Gary Larson, The Far Side

Oh that’s right – fear mongering brought to you by the radically anti-collecting North America Butterfly Association.  NABA perceives collecting as one of the gravest dangers to butterfly populations despite the incredible lack of evidence.  Yes, every collector out there is sporting an evil black cape and making it their life’s work to extinguish beauty from the world.  Somehow this organization has managed to convince the USFWS they have a point.  I can’t do this provision justice, so here is the exact quote.

In addition, the Service is issuing a 4(d) special rule on these species to establish prohibitions on collection and commercial trade within the United States. This action also prohibits the import into, and export from, the United States of the three similar butterflies. Otherwise lawful activities that may impact these similar butterflies—such as legal use of pesticides, mowing, and vehicle use—are not prohibited. Extending the prohibitions of collection, possession, and trade to the three similar butterflies will provide greater protection to the Miami blue.

 

I’m honestly speechless.  Well, maybe I can manage a few more words.

Go ahead and mow down your patch of habitat and then spray herbicide on it.  But you better not dare to collect a single blue… the USFWS is watching.

They also turn out to be rather paranoid.  Sure, poaching does happen every once in a while no matter what species you protect.  Whether it be for profit or food, a few odd animals will be picked off.  But is there any real evidence to support this level of craziness?  The majority of citations in the registrar are from cases, not peer-reviewed journals.

the Service has determined that designation of critical habitat for the Miami blue butterfly is not prudent because publishing maps and descriptions of critical habitat areas would widely announce the exact location of the butterfly to poachers, collectors, and vandals and may further facilitate disturbance and destruction of the butterfly’s habitat.

Oh I do love quotes: (source)

but also indicates that there is no evidence or information on current or past collection pressure on the Miami blue (FWC 2010, p. 13)… Although we do not have evidence of illegal collection of the Miami blue, we do have evidence of illegal collection of other butterflies from Federal lands in south Florida …

…The same Web site offers specimens of two other butterflies similar in appearance to the Miami blue; the ceraunus blue currently sells for €4.00 ($5.57), and the cassius blue is available for €2.50-10.00 ($3.48-$13.93).

… Therefore, it is quite possible that collectors authorized to collect similar species may inadvertently (or purposefully) collect the Miami blue butterfly thinking it was, or planning to claim they thought it was, the cassius blue, nickerbean blue, or ceraunus blue

 

Don’t get me wrong – additional funding and protection for a rare species might be helpful as long as the habitat is safeguarded.  It seems however that the vast majority of funds tend to go into captive breeding programs which doubtfully do much good.  If the butterfly is vanishing from the islands then releasing clouds of them will only make for pretty photographs and not a saved species.

I will be submitting a solicited comment and I suggest you do the same. Comment here before October 11, 2011: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. [FWS–R4–ES–2011–0043].  Or write to: U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. [FWS–R4–ES–2011–0043]; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203..

Monday Moth

 

This week’s moth is a video of a dancing micro from the Philippines (taken by Warren Laurde).  As you might suspect this is a mating display that ends in a pretty spectacular headstand.  There are lots of other microleps that have dancing or display behavior, but there are almost no other videos online and few as high quality as this one.  I am thinking this is a Cosmopterigidae, something approaching the genus Ressia.  I am unable to find confirmed records of anything near this genus from SE Asia (and nothing in the Microlepidoptera of the Philippine Islands) – but doing a google search I did find another image of what might be this same moth!

% title

Cosmopterigidae - Melvyn Yeo

(source)

Monday Moth

% title

Chiricahua multidentata (Geometridae)

This Monday’s moth is a spectacular species from the mountains of Arizona – Chiricahua multidentata, a Geometrid.  The only known location for this species is at the very top of the Chiricahua mountains above 9,000 feet (which was just bruned to a crisp).  Hopefully the fire was not entirely devastating and the population will rebound in the years to come.  Before 2009 this moth was known from fewer than 10 specimens, all captured at the slightly lower elevation on Onion Saddle in the Chiricahuas.  In the spring of 2009 access to a gated road lead to the collection of dozens of specimens in a single night.  All of the previous records had been rare strays that had flown down to 8500′ – but the simple act of driving up an extra 1000′ 500’put the collector in the ideal habitat and surprisingly this moth was common!  This seems to be par for the course with most insects, very few are actually rare while the rest are just difficult to capture.  Either they don’t come to lights, don’t forage within arm’s length, or only live in hard to access habitats.  Once you discover their biology (or get lucky) you usually can find the animal in abundance.

You might have also noticed the regular posting of Monday Moth – I’ve been out in the field for the last two weeks and had a stack of scheduled posts.  I should start mixing things up more now!